Summary of Claimant's Argument

We have left most information out, particularly the rules of court, until the time is right.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF
NEW SOUTH WALES
SYDNEY REGISTRY

COURT OF APPEAL File No: 40839 of 2006

BETWEEN Fiona Caroline Cristian
Claimant

- and –

PERPETUAL LIMITED
FORMERLY KNOWN AS
PERPETUAL TRUSTEE
AUSTRALIA LIMITED
Opponent

CLAIMANT’S WHITE FOLDER

Containing:
(a) Summons for Leave to Appeal
(b) Summary of Claimant’s Argument, 1. 2. 3.
(c) Judgment of Hidden J
(d) Transcripts - 30th October 2006 - 1st November 2006 - 15th November 2006
(e) Common Law Documents – Defendant: Fiona Caroline Cristian (all) filed before judgment by Hidden J - 15/11/06. 1. Notice of Appearance. 2. Defence.
3. Cross Claim / Cross Summons. 4. Affidavit of Arthur Cristian. 5. Exhibits (part of).
6. Affidavit of John Hartney. 7. First Affidavit of Fiona Caroline Cristian.
8. Second Affidavit of Fiona Caroline Cristian. 9. Third Affidavit of Fiona Caroline
Cristian. 10. Notice of Motion joining Macquarie Mortgages. 11. Notice of Motion
joining Galilee Solicitors. 12. Notice of Motion for Discovery.
(f) Common Law Documents – Plaintiff: Perpetual Limited (all) filed before judgment by Hidden J - 15/11/06. 1. Statement of Claim. 2. Notice of Motion.
3. Affidavit of Amanda Sherwood. 4. Exhibit AS1 – Loan Contract. 5. Exhibit
AS2 – Certificate of Title. 6. Exhibit AS3 – Mortgage. 7. Exhibit AS4 –
Mortgage Memorandum. 8. Exhibit AS5 – Letter, Real Property Act Sect
57(2)(b). 9. Exhibit AS6 – Letter, Consumer Credit Code Sect 80
(g) Draft Notice of Appeal
(h) Other Documents 1. Letter Dr Evan Jones Sydney University, Political
Economics 28/02/07. 2. Notice to Vacate – Nowra Sheriff. 3. 8th Affidavit
Fiona Cristian filed in Court of Appeal 22/12/06. 4. Amended Notice of
Motion filed in Court of Appeal 22/12/06. 5. Corporation Australia. 6. Note
to refer 6th Affidavit Fiona Cristian located in Summary of Claimants
Argument Part B. 7. Two Notice of Motions filed 28/11/06 and dismissed by
Registrar Howe 14/12/06.
(i) Opponent’s Documents
(j) Claimant’s Reply
Claimant: Fiona Caroline Cristian : - Phone: 0418 203204

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF
NEW SOUTH WALES
SYDNEY REGISTRY

COURT OF APPEAL File No: 40839 of 2006

COURT BELOW:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF
NEW SOUTH WALES
SYDNEY REGISTRY
COMMON LAW DIVISION File No: 13403 of 2006

OVERVIEW OF CLAIMANTS ARGUMENT

1.
Claimant’s Personal Introduction to
Rules of Court
(1 Page)

2.
PART A
(9 Pages)

Rules Of Court
By Enid Campbell Professor Of Law

A Study of Rule Making Powers And Procedures

3.
PART B
(19 Pages)

SUMMARY OF CLAIMANTS ARGUMENT

67 Points of Argument

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Claimant’s Personal Introduction to
Rules of Court

The Legal Profession self admitted skullduggery, collusionism and power with banks is to be diminished and this document is the start of it. My salvojure right and the rights of all other victims for self-defence against the legal profession court and banking judiciary antagonist and tyranny.

What you have here is only the tip of the iceberg that is going to come crashing down on this evil system. The whole of Australia, particularly the common ordinary people, are going to discover your secrets and anfractus legal profession underhanded legal secret intricacies, to be known by those you insultingly call frivolous, void of legal capacity and despairingly call laymen, fellow man, humans and mankind, because they are not sufficiently mentally developed in legal profession treachery, and the knowledge of legal profession bank property stealing treachery. Those who are unaware of your clandestine extortionist activities, which are now to be made public far and wide, are about to learn and discover and be enlightened about your legal processes and procedures. My husband and I will engage others in assisting us to plan to make re-enactments of our court case and others. There is no way Judges, Magistrates, Registrars, Barristers, Lawyers, Solicitors, Politicians, Bureaucrats and Bankers are going to escape the ultimate reprimand for their misconduct by aggravated victims and animosity.

This document IS the legal profession and banking admissions, that they lie, cheat, steal, swindle, alter transcripts and practice endless deceitful activity of scoundrels as shown in the rules of court which are so self evident, incontrovertible and unarguable. Sign of the T is very significant. You are the T error ist and you make terrorism laws purposely to label others as terrorists so you can convict them for standing up against you. Your terrorism is a errorism with a T in front of it and you use this as a weapon against anybody who is fed up with your evil activity because you undeniably allow them no recourse. So you give them the false title of Terrorist when they are dissatisfied and object to evil dictator conduct such as property theft. You cannot deny you are the terrorist and you accuse anyone who goes against you of being a terrorist.

There is only one way to ameliorate (to make things better for all concerned) this situation and that is for the court to order a tender of amends by returning the property rightfully unencumbered, be appropriately compensated in eight figures, remove my husbands bankruptcy and in return I will cease my plans of retaliation immediately. I am prepared to hold off for 48 hours (Wednesday 10.00am 7th March 2007). If there is no favourable reply I will then be justified in exposing even more serious information that will be petitioned to the public and who will discover the full extent of the legal profession and banking corrupt activism, which is too shocking to contemplate. You are facing your own grave dangers caused by your own literature.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF
NEW SOUTH WALES
SYDNEY REGISTRY

COURT OF APPEAL File No: 40839 of 2006

COURT BELOW:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF
NEW SOUTH WALES
SYDNEY REGISTRY

COMMON LAW DIVISION File No: 13403 of 2006

SUMMARY OF CLAIMANTS ARGUMENT
PART A

Rules of Court
By
Enid Campbell Professor Of Law
Occupying The Chair Of
Sir Isaacs Isaacs Professor of Law
At
The Monash University

ISBN No 0 455 20630 9
1932
Comprising
A Study of Rule Making Powers And Procedures

This book is Clearly directing the legal profession to legally swindle, exploit, deceive, Persecute and plunder the trusting duped naive masses of Law trusting victims as the Following two excerpts reveal amply for the public to consider and self discover.

Abuse of Process
Page 234.

Withheld for now.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------