Mysterious Dr Mullen from Monash
by Andrew S. MacGregor
Mysterious Dr Mullen from Monash
After the Monash University shooting, which set the Australian Prime Minister, John Howard, calling for new firearm control laws, a subject which is not covered by the Australian Federal Constitution, there were several debates made by various members of the Coalition for Gun Control movement.
One of these radio events was an extremely interesting debate between Gary Fleetwood of the SSAA (Sporting Shooters Association of Australia) and Professor Paul Mullen for the Victoria Police Association Mullen is a Forensic Psychiatrist, of whom I have some knowledge, but even as a former member of the Victoria Police, I was never aware of Mullen’s membership to the Victoria Police Association.
It is quite possible that Mullen replaced the former Victoria Police psychiatrist, who was forced to retire from that position when he was convicted for drug offences relating to his $1000 a day heroin habit. However, the Victoria Police Association members are the rank and file of the Victoria Police, and do not include the management of the police, that is members of and above the rank of Inspector and definitely not the likes of Professor Paul E. Mullen.
Mullen is the Clinical Director and also the Chief Psychiatrist at Victoria’s Forensicare, a new corporation that has taken over the facilities of the old Fairfield Infectious Diseases Hospital. Forensicare’s state of the art, high security hospital for mentally ill offenders, will undoubtedly be where the Monash University gunman will be housed.
Along with Mullen, there is another crony on the Forensicare’s Board, the former Labor Party’s State Attorney General of 1987, Jim Kennan, who was with the then Police Minister, Race Matthews, when they witnessed the Queen Street Massacre shooter, Frank Vitkovic, fall to his death from the 11th floor of the Post Office Building.
Mullen wrote the psychiatric report on Martin Bryant that was presented in Bryant’s sentencing by the Hobart Supreme Court in November 1996. By all accounts, Mullen is extremely anti-firearms, as many of his articles attest. However, I would like to bring the readers’ attention to what was written in an article in "The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law" penned by Christopher H. Cantor, MBBS MRCPsych, FRANZCP, Paul E. (P.E.M.) Mullen, MBBS, MRCPsych, MphilPsychMed, FRANZCP, FRCPsych, Dsc, and Philip A. Alpers. The article was "Mass Homicide: The Civil Massacre."
"In the cases of Knight (Case 1) and Bryant (Case 7), one author (P.E.M.) has had the advantage of interviewing them, but only material in the public domain was utilised. In the case of Gray (Case 4), P.E.M. both lives in the immediate vicinity of the massacre and was responsible for the local psychiatric services involved in the aftermath and with the subsequent inquiries reconstructing the tragedy."
What we are told here is that professor Paul E. Mullen was working in Melbourne in 1987, and was able to have some consultations with the Hoddle Street shooter, Julian Knight. We are also aware that Mullen was working in Melbourne in 1996, when he was requested by the Tasmanian Government to interview Martin Bryant, that 3-1/2 hour interview taking place at the Royal Hobart Hospital on May 3, 1996. However, what we are told by "In the case of Gray (Case 4)" is that Professor Mullen was residing in the area of Aramoana in New Zealand when David Gray committed that shooting massacre in November 1990. In other words, Mullen was working and residing in Melbourne in 1987, and did work as a government Forensic Psychiatrist, then moved to Aramoana, a small rural village outside Taupo on the North Island of New Zealand so that he was present and able to assist that community, and then moved back to Melbourne in time for the Port Arthur Massacre.
Another interesting piece from this American article, which was not meant for the average Australian was written on Julian Knight, and as Mullen personally interviewed Knight, Mullen would have had the main input for this report.
"J.K. was examined by a number of psychiatrists and psychologists. Although a prepsychotic condition was suggested, the predominant opinion was of a narcissistic young man involved in his world of fantasy. J.K.’s subsequent course in prison has made any psychotic condition highly unlikely, but obsessional personality traits and narcissism have become more obvious."
This view of Julian Knight is not what the Australian media has presented to the Australian public, so why has it been presented to the American academia?
Oh, by the way, what I have neglected to inform the reader is that Professor Paul E Mullen is also Professor of Forensic Psychiatry at Monash University.
When it became obvious that Mullen’s report on Martin Bryant was a major fraud, full of lies and inconsistencies and a major coverup of that massacre, then we must really ask the question as to what his role in the Monash University shooting is going to entail?
_____________________________
The reference to Mullen being part of the Vic Police Association should be disregarded as the writer misheard a report on ABC radio. The person was a Paul Mullet who is not Mullen. It was not known until after this article was published.
Another amazing coincidence is disclosed in the article below detailing the life and times of Dr Paul Mullen. Apart from his shonky claims about Martin Bryant we now find that Mullen just happens to have been residing in the areas where all the notable gun massacres that occurred since the late 1980s including the 1990 New Zealand one in Aramonana.
Shootersnews believes Monash University students understandably upset over the shootings there late last year should seek their answers from Dr Mullen who seems to be singularly up on all these gun massacres.
Link to this article: http://members.iimetro.com.au/~hubbca/mullins.htm
From newspaper clipping at http://www.shootersnews.addr.com/snportarthur.html
--------------------------------------
30th July 2008
Comments From Faye McGarry To Terence Malaher Who Resides In Tasmania
Hogwash.Martin did not have a functioning brain to commit evil. One had to be extremely cunning, and cold hearted as well as a deadly accurate sharpshooter. His last activity was to surf the waves, an act that shows he embraced life and his surroundings. Most of the whole of Australia knows that Martin was the patsy, and here is why:
http://members.iimetro.com.au/~hubbca/mullins.htm (this is the above document)
"What we are told here is that professor Paul E. Mullen was working in Melbourne in 1987, and was able to have some consultations with the Hoddle Street shooter, Julian Knight. We are also aware that Mullen was working in Melbourne in 1996, when he was requested by the Tasmanian Government to interview Martin Bryant, that 3-1/2 hour interview taking place at the Royal Hobart Hospital on May 3, 1996.
However, what we are told by "In the case of Gray (Case 4)" is that Professor Mullen was residing in the area of Aramoana in New Zealand when David Gray committed that shooting massacre in November 1990. In other words, Mullen was working and residing in Melbourne in 1987, and did work as a government Forensic Psychiatrist, then moved to Aramoana, a small rural village outside Taupo on the North Island of New Zealand so that he was present and able to assist that community, and then moved back to Melbourne in time for the Port Arthur Massacre.
Another amazing coincidence is disclosed in the article below detailing the life and times of Dr Paul Mullen. Apart from his shonky claims about Martin Bryant we now find that Mullen just happens to have been residing in the areas where all the notable gun massacres that occurred since the late 1980s including the 1990 New Zealand one in Aramonana.
Shootersnews believes Monash University students understandably upset over the shootings there late last year should seek their answers from Dr Mullen who seems to be singularly up on all these gun massacres.
F.A McGarry
--- On Wed, 30/7/08, Terence Malaher wrote:
From: Terence Malaher
Subject: Re: Bryant
To: Faye
Received: Wednesday, 30 July, 2008, 5:33 AM
Faye - I respond with THE facts.
[Faye said: I thought Martin Bryant was set up. No one with half a brain, and goofy handed, could shoot 32 people clean dead in seconds. Spot-on marksmanship with a dead eye and no shaky hands and no love for life, was required to pull that off.]
Terence Says Martin was being 'set up' within his own mind for a long time prior to THE DAY by incoming telepathic thoughts - - - His 'mind' was not 'there' at the time because he was totally 'possessed' by a very dark and powerful DEMON that took control of his biological body and did what IT wished to. That is the fact of the matter. In this type of spirit possession the 'mortal' when 'released' from their mental possession cannot remember what their flesh did because their mind was not in conscious control.
That Martin's FLESH held the gun and took control of the situation is NOT in doubt, for he was seen holding and firing the gun. The only reason for the many disbelievers being unable to accept that he could have done it was because no one is aware of the absolute power & control of demonic forces.
----- Original Message -----
From: Faye McGarry
To: Terence Malaher
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 12:46 PM
Subject: Re: Reply from Fiona Cristian to Dai Buckley: What Are We Waiting For?
Uh! Am I slow or what.I thought Martin Bryant was set up. No one with half a brain, and goofy handed, could shoot 32 people clean dead in seconds. Spot-on marksmanship with a dead eye and no shaky hands and no love for life, was required to pull that off.
--- On Tue, 29/7/08, Terence Malaher wrote:
From: Terence Malaher
Subject: Re: Reply from Fiona Cristian to Dai Buckley: What Are We Waiting For?
To: act...@loveforlife.com.au
Received: Tuesday, 29 July, 2008, 7:05 PM
Dear Fiona, I am in receipt of your letter to Dai and comment as follows between your lines;
To continue see: http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/5147 or go direct to comments here: http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/5147#comments