
John Wilsons Website RightsAndWrong.com.au
Latest Posting From John Wilson 18th September 2008
The Office of the Sheriff,
Burwood Court House,
7-9 Belmore Street,
Burwood,
NSW 2134,
Australia.
Email to: burw...@agd.nsw.gov.au
Dear Fellow Australians,
Next Tuesday, 23rd September 2008, your honour, your loyalty to your country, and your love for your neighbour as yourself, will be put to the test....because I will be at the Burwood Local Court for a C.A.N. H34747114 (Court Attendance Notice) that has 6 "Arrest Warrants" against me....all of which are false because they have been issued by the "Magistrates" of various "Courts" which can only be described as "Kangaroo Courts" because they were conducted by "Magistrates" who disregarded my legal right to Trial by Jury and disregarded the legal procedure of my Challenging the Jurisdiction of the Court. The awards, doings and proceedings of such "Courts" are not to be drawn into consequence or example, ie: they are illegal and void.....however, in order for the Banks and the Judges to continue to steal and destroy the laws and liberties of the People, they rely upon the Sheriffs to enforce their tyranny.
The "Judges" and Magistrates" are the ones concealing the Truth. They are the ones protecting the criminal practices of the Banks. They are the ones perverting the Course of Justice. They are the enemies of Liberty....and they can't do it without your help...without your "just following orders".
On Tuesday, I will, of course, Challenge the Jurisdiction of the Court because I have been denied my inalienable Right to Trial by Jury. Will you carry out the expected orders from the "Magistrate" to arrest me and deliver me to the Corrective Services to be imprisoned...or will you honour your sworn duty to ensure that People can exercise their Rights in Court in safety? The "Magistrate" will clearly commit the heinous offence of denying me Trial by Jury which is, in fact, Treason because Trial by Jury is Democracy.
From your own website, your "Mission" is "to protect the New South Wales justice system" ...Justice being "the protection of rights and the punishment of wrongs".
From your own website, your "Vision" is that "all participants in the judicial system can access their rights in safety; the public trusts the integrity of the jury system; the community is confident that the orders of the course deliver justice; and our people are well trained and highly motivated to achieve our Mission".
From your own website, your "Values" are "Leadership: we are responsible for our actions & allow our people to excel. Integrity: we act in the interests of justice and our Code of Conduct, without fear or favour. Accountability: we keep true records, give reasons for our actions and communicate clearly. Innovation: continually review & improve the way we work, understanding our strengths and weaknesses. Safety: we understand and actively manage the risks we face".
The Sheriff is "the chief officer of the Crown". The Crown is Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland who has sworn to govern and protect the People of Australia in her Coronation Oath.
A plaque at the Magna Carta Monument in Canberra's Parliamentary Triangle says, "Magna carta is now seen as a traditional mandate for trial by jury, justice for all, accountable government and no arbitrary imprisonment".Trial by Jury is described as "the glory of English law"; "the Palladium of Liberty"; "the Bulwark of Freedom", and "the only defence against Tyranny". Your own website has booklets extolling the importance of Trial by Jury.
How will you act on Tuesday when a "Magistrate" in the Burwood Local Court does what all "Magistrates" and "Judges" in Australia now do, ie: deny that the People have the Right to Trial by Jury?
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au
PS: Contact details for Sheriffs throughout NSW can be found on http://www.sheriff.nsw.gov.au/lawlink/local_courts/ll_localcourts.nsf/pa...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posting From John Wilson 14th September 2008
MORE EVIL THAN TREASON:
Dear Friends in Liberty,
“And this occurred because of false brethren secretly brought in (who came in by stealth to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, that they might bring us into bondage),” (Galatians 2:4)
If we are to be free, we must apply the Rule of Law which is “1. The supremacy of law. 2. A feature attributed to the UK constitution by Professor Dicey (Law of the Constitution, 1885). It embodied three concepts: the absolute predominance of regular law, so that the government has no arbitrary authority over the citizen; the equal subjection of all (including officials) to the ordinary law administered by the ordinary courts; and the fact that the citizen’s personal freedoms are formulated and protected by the ordinary law rather than by abstract constitutional declarations.”
All law, in fact, hangs on loving God and loving your neighbour as yourself (Matthew 22: 35 – 40).
God has sovereignty over all People and God has given We the People a second level sovereignty that demands we protect ourselves, our families, our friends, our neighbours, our country, and our world. Sovereignty is “the ultimate authority to make and impose laws”. People exercise this sovereignty through the unanimous judgments of Juries, who are gatherings of 12 Freemen who ask, "So help me God", in order for them to administer Justice… and Justice is "the protection of rights and the punishment of wrongs". Trial by Jury is Democracy.
Treason, itself, is the violation of allegiance to one's country. But infinitely more evil than simple Treason, is the deprivation of our connection to God that is established when Freemen call upon God to help make and impose Common Law.
Thomas Jefferson said he "I believe trial by jury is the only anchor yet imagined by man that can hold a government to the principles of its constitution". And, I believe that applies to every country in the world. I truly believe that Tyranny can only be defeated by People exercising their Right to Trial by Jury...their Right to ask "So help me God".
I believe that it is a just cause to fight for the domestic and international categorical imperative of Trial by Jury. My working as a dentist has until now, funded this campaign. Now the Banks and the Judges have destroyed that livelihood. They have unlawfully dispossessed me of my dental practice and unlawfully declaring me bankrupt. By the Judges denying me the Right to Trial by Jury, my claims for damages against the Crown that would fund the fight have been struck out.
I have no choice but to ask for financial support to continue this fight. In the past, I have asked several prominent Australian businessmen for donations...but without success. I have no access to my bank accounts....and ask that contributions be sent to my wife's bank account, the details for which are:
Account holder: Laraine Wilson.
BSB - 032282
CAN - 126213
The American Fully Informed Jury Association (www.FIJA.org) was set up by Mr Larry Dodge to foster support for Trial by Jury to protect their Constitutional Rights in that country. He did it by raising funds from patriotic American businessmen. My efforts in Australia have now been crushed by the "evil counsellors, judges and ministers who subvert and extirpate the laws and liberties of the people" (Bill of Rights 1688).
This is War between the Banks and the People. I want the People to win.
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
14th September 2008.
http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au
19 Elm Place, North Rocks, NSW 2151, Australia.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
John Wilson Update Provided By John Wilson (includes a link to video of what happened) 12th September 2008
Dear Fellow Australians,
Tuesday 9 September 2008, North Rocks, Australia.
Channel 9 broadcast this story on their "A Current Affair" program... http://video.msn.com/?mkt=en-au&brand=ninemsn&tab=m164 It's the one called "Home Eviction".
The "Notice to Vacate" was acted upon by the Sheriff's Officers. Sheriff Inspector Shane Flexman formally handed the property to a representative of Australia's biggest firm of real estate agent, L/J.Hooker, and the little person instructed the NSW Police Force to arrest me for "trespassing". I was taken to the "Dock" at the Castle Hill Police Station, held for 10 hours and then transferred to Parramatta Police Station cells....handcuffs, etc. At 4:45 AM woken for a bowl of rice bubbles and milk. Transferred to the cells of the Parramatta Court at 10:00 AM. 11:45 AM taken into Court and given bail. Released 1 hour 30 minutes later.
On Thursday 11 September 2008, I went to the NSW Supreme Court where I had, the previous week, filed a Challenge to the Jurisdiction of the Court. Justice Rothman disregarded the legal procedure and had me imprisoned in the cells "until the Court rises" and I was escorted out of the building at 1:15 PM.
Today, Friday 12 September 2008, I accompanied Ray Lovett to the NSW Supreme Court where he had filed a Summons against the Sheriff of NSW for the assault on him on 22 February that hospitalising him. In June, Justice Kirby had denied Ray his Right to Trial by Jury. Today Justice Rothman disregarded Ray's statements of "I have not consented to be without a Jury." , "This Court has no Jurisdiction to proceed summarily." and "I Challenge the Jurisdiction of the Court." Justice Rothman then dismissed Ray's Summons and awarded costs against Ray.
This coming Monday 15 September 2008, I will be in the NSW Supreme Court for the Summons I have filed against the State of New South Wales for "Unlawful Imprisonment" because the Arrest warrant for when I was arrested and imprisoned on 20 August 2008 read that "Reasons for Arrest" that I had "Failed to appear at Burwood local Court on July 30 2008" when, in fact, I did attend and have the transcript of me arguing with Magistrate Dakin and him having me removed by the Sheriffs.
This coming Monday, I expect the usual Kangaroo Court routine of a Judge disregarding the legal right of Trial by Jury, disregarding the legal procedure of a Challenge to the Jurisdiction of the Court, and then the dismissal of the Indictment.
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
---------------------
John Wilson Update Provided By Dallas & Kerrie Kelso 11th September 2008
Hi Everyone,
Just a quick update on John Wilson, following his arrest on Tuesday, September 9th, 2008.
John was held in by the Castle Hill Police until being transported the following day to Parramatta Court. We don’t have the entire details yet, but we understand the matter is not yet closed.
We are told that a representative from LJ Hooker told the Police to arrest John Wilson for Trespass. What a joke! The Sheriff had only just arrived on John Wilsons property and the locksmiths had only just started changing the locks. Normally people are given 20 mins or so to collect their personal belongings etc.
If this is true about LJ Hooker ordering John’s arrest, then they are just as bad as Homeway First National Real Estate, possibly worse!
LJ Hooker you’re the best. NOT!!!!!
Real Estate agents and Police are working against the public in these matters. The Police should have nothing to do with possession orders, unless there is a reported disturbance of the peace. Clearly, this never happened, so why did 14 Castle Hill Police offices arrive at the scene?
Today, in the Hills Shire Times, the entire front page is dedicated to Castle Hill Police station being dreadfully low on Staff numbers, yet they send out 14 officers to assist the Sheriff to take possession of a home! They can’t be this short staffed to allow this many officers to these matters, considering it has nothing to do with the Police (Cival Matter).
We know they really are short staffed, and Sgt Andrew Ryabovitch told me personally (concerning our own matter), when Gaden’s Lawyers tried to get them involved in our repossession, “this has nothing to do with the Police, it is a Cival Matter”. This just goes to show what power the banks have over our law enforcement agencies.
We believe John is waiting on a new internet connection, so stay tuned for an update from the man himself.
Sincerely,
Dallas & Kerrie Kelso
------------------------------------
John Wilson Update 9th September 2008
This evening we received this email regarding John Wilson being in Jail again. Including what is generously being offered by Dallas & Kerrie Kelso see below you can also post your comments to the Love For Life Website here: http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/5367
We will do everything we can to spread this news all over the globe and support an action to help free John and bring to account everyone involved and responsible for this terrorist attack.
Conscious Love Always
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
action @ loveforlife.com.au
www.loveforlife.com.au
-------------------
9th September 2008
John Wilson Arrested
Taken from Dallas & Kerrie Kelso's Website Take Back Your Home
Dear Readers
Today, we attended a morning tea BBQ at John Wilson’s dental surgery North Rocks. It was a great time getting to meet other people (probably 30 - 40 in total), who have had wrongs done to them by the Australian Banking system, the Courts and the law enforcement agencies.
Local television reporters came along to see what was going on, and interview most of the people present. Everyone had a story to tell. There was even one guy, who had been put in prison for 14 days, for wearing a tee shirt that has the words “Trial By Jury is Democracy”. I don’t know about you, but what is the crime in wearing a tee shirt that states the obvious? Perhaps there was more to it, but it sounds like this message is not appreciated by the Judges in our Courts.
At around 10.30am, we needed to get going, so we got on with out day. We did see a large Police van drive past just before leaving, and put it down to being a coincidence.
At or around midday, we are told that approximately 14 Police officers (3-4 being TAG Officers), 2 Sheriffs and 4 “helpers” arrived at the 331 North Rocks Rd, North Rocks address. The television film crew had already left the premises, but luckily, three other people had video camera’s handy and caught the whole event on film!
So our question and everyone else who attended this peaceful meeting today, is why was all of those Police and Sheriffs required to take possession of a home? There was no disturbance of the peace taking place. Why was John arrested?
The same thing happened to us on Thursday, August 14th, 2008 at 7.30am (three Police officers arrived), but we had a Stay of Writ in place. The Bank and Sheriff forgot to tell the Castle Hill Police about this. It seems that the Banks feel they can get the Police in Civil matters, and basically waste their time. We already have a shortage of good Police Officers, don’t we?
We are not sure what John has been charged with as yet. Tonight, we called Castle Hill Police to find out if he could be released. The person who answered the phone, Jill, informed us that he been refused bail, and would be attending Parramatta Court at 9.30am tomorrow (Wednesday, September 10th, 2008).
As we find out more, we will let you all know.
Sincerely,
Dallas & Kerrie Kelso
--------------------------------
9th September 2008
Original email received from Dallas & Kerrie Kelso
Dear People,
Its Dallas Kelso here, touching base about the events that have transpired today.
Today, we attended a morning tea put on by John Wilson, to celebrate democracy. It was a peaceful meeting with like minded people, who basically share a common point of view, to stop the banks doing wrong by the people.
I had to leave at about 10.30am. At or around midday today, I am told that approximately 14 Police officers (3-4 TAG Officers), 2 Sheriff’s and 4 helpers arrived at 331 North Rocks Rd, North Rocks, with the intention of taking possession of this property. We are still a little sketchy on the details, but have put a post up on the website http://takebackyourhome.com.au and we know that some of you receiving this email would have been on the property once all this took place.
Please make sure you put your own comments on the web site under the post by clicking on the comments link – under the post at http://takebackyourhome.com.au/latestposts/john-wilson-arrested
The question we have is why was it necessary for the Police to be there anyway? There was no disturbance of the peace, so why involve the Police?
Tonight, I have called Castle Hill Police (our local station) to see if we could get John out. The person I spoke to, Jill, said that Bail has been refused and that John will be appearing in Parramatta Court at 9.30am tomorrow morning (Wednesday, September 10th, 2008).
Regrettably, it is not possible for me to be there, but if anyone else can make it to show your support, I know John would appreciate it.
For those who can, please pray for John’s family that they will be safe and well looked after.
Now that First Mac http://www.firstmac.com.au have John’s property, there will be no place for John to run his business (for the time being). I have left a message to let her know we will support her and the family in any way possible.
While I don’t want to predict the worst, it sounded like the law enforces intend to keep John locked up for as long as possible. Regardless of your religious beliefs, we need to be reminded that most of the New Testament Bible was written by Paul, during his frequent stays in prison, and it was from this place, where many of his letters of encouragement went out to the people and helped to strengthen the believers!
That’s something for the law enforcement agencies to consider! When you lock up a good man, he will have time to think and get this message out to the masses.
For anyone who is prepared to do some practical acts of kindness for John’s family, please write back. It could even be just to include some additional items in your shopping so we can help John’s wife with stocking up on grocery items and non perishable foods etc. We all know that John has been fighting hard for this cause for many years, so let’s show our appreciation by helping his family.
We need to remember that John’s wife will be feeling all alone right now. Based on previous conversations with John’s wife, I know she would appreciate NOT being called by everyone, so please respect her wishes. Kerrie and I will happily coordinate delivery of these items to John’s family.
Sincerely,
Dallas Kelso
www.TakeBackYourHome.com.au
-------------------------------------------------------------
8th September 2008
From John Wilson
Dear Fellow Australians,
Tomorrow morning.....starting at 08:00 hrs....331 North Rocks Road, North Rocks, Sydney, NSW 2151, Australia.
A "Sausage Sizzle" to celebrate Truth, Justice, Freedom and Democracy.
A celebration of the Spirit of the Eureka Stockade....the Beacon of Democracy.
We the People are sovereign human beings and have the inalienable Right to Trial by Jury...the lawful judgment of our equals.
We cannot be taken or imprisoned, nor suffer trespass, nor be dispossessed, nor punished unless by the lawful judgment of our equals.
Bank loans with variable interest rates are fraud.
Foreclosures and Writs of Possession are illegal unless by the lawful judgment of our equals.
Bankers and Judges MUST be brought under the Rule of Law.
Tomorrow morning....starting at 08:00 hrs....331 North Rocks road, North Rocks, Sydney, NSW 2151, Australia.
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au
----------------------------------------------------------
6th September 2008
Dear Fellow Australians,
An emailers suggestion that Tuesday's Sausage Sizzle should be called "E-DAY" is a good one. I described the EUREKA STOCKADE as the BEACON OF DEMOCRACY because that's exactly what it is....when ordinary men made a stand for the Rights and 6 separate Juries of their equals judged them to have NOT DONE WRONG and NOT GUILTY of the charge of HIGH TREASON for which the British Governor of Victoria wanted the Men hung by their neck until dead. This chapter in our history is of crucial importance and must be learnt by all Australians. It is commemorated and incorporated into the MAGNA CARTA MONUMENT in Canberra's Parliamentary gardens..and is a MUST VISIT.
I've brought the barbeque up to 331 North Rocks Road, North Rocks, NSW 2151 with some tables and chairs, etc. There is be sausages, onions, sauces, bread, coffee, tea, cordial, etc. Starting at 8:00AM
Ordinary decent Australians...men and women...will be there helping - not only with the cooking, but, more importantly talking to each other and learning from each other.
The Sheriffs have "served" me with a "NOTICE TO VACATE" for 9:30 AM on Tuesday 9 September 2008...a "NOTICE" will ridiculous because it is flawed in every possible way. I have filed a NOTICE OF MOTION plus a CHALLENGE TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE COURT in the NSW Supreme Court which is listed before the Court on 11th September 2008 at 9:00AM...also the TITLE SEARCH on 4 September 2008 shows my name only in the "FIRST SCHEDULE". This information I have handed into the Parramatta Sheriff's Office, yesterday. And so, the Sheriff may or may not show up ... they keep on saying "I am just doing my job.", ie: I am just following orders."
Indeed, they are most welcome....because they have to realize that their primary and paramount duty is "to ensure that people can exercise their rights in court in safety" (as it is written in their own website).
We must recruit them on OUR SIDE...the SIDE OF RIGHT.
I will have a new banner saying "TRUTH JUSTICE FREEDOM DEMOCRACY" to go with the "COMMON LAW RIGHTS GROUP" one. There will be green and gold balloons ...and we will TOAST THE MAGNA CARTA with tea and coffee.
Oh, if only I had some money to fund a travelling unit to visit Australian cities and towns....and repeat this format...if only.
Yours sincerely
John Wilson
http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au
----------------------------------------------------------
5th September 2008
Dear Fellow Australians,
Here is the rough footage of the video taken last Monday of the local Sheriffs delivering the unlawful "NOTICE TO VACATE".
Video: Local Sheriffs Delivering The Unlawful "NOTICE TO VACATE" 3 Minutes 40 Seconds
Yesterday I filed a NOTICE OF MOTION and CHALLENGE TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE COURT. Immediately there is the legal procedure of a Challenge to the Jurisdiction, there is a peremptory, mandatory and absolute Stay of Proceedings until the jurisdiction has been determined by a Special Jury.
However, in Australia, the Rule of Law has been thrown out the window by the Banks and the Judges. The definition of a kangaroo court is "a court which acts unfairly or dishonestly or disregards legal procedures". Our inalienable right to trial by jury is disregarded everytime we go to court....and everytime I challenge the jurisdiction of the court, that is disregarded.
Why? Because, when the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth is told to a fully infromed Jury, the Banksters and Judges will be imprisoned for many, many years.
Also yesterday, a TITLE SEARCH of my property at the Department of Lands shows only my name in the FIRST SCHEDULE.
The counsellors, judges and ministers are not simply evil, they are quite stupid.
They have lost...but, what do really bad and stupid buggers do when they know they have been beaten?
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au
PS: I am just about to go into Parramatta to deliver a letter, with copied documents of the above material, to the Sheriff.
PPS: The Good Book says the truth will make us free.
PPPS: Next Tuesday's Sausage Sizzle is still very much ON.
-------------------------------------------------------------
5th September 2008
Inspector Shane Flexman,
Parramatta Sheriff's Office,
Marsden Road,
Parramatta,
NSW 2150.
Email to: parramattasheriff @ agd.nsw.gov.au
Dear Shane,
Here is a copy-n-paste of an email I have just received:
If you folk think you have it bad take a bearing on the poor Aussies who are having their homes stolen through the collusion of the banksters, judges, and sheriffs.
Dr Wilson has the answer that the thieves are ignoring and that is the common law and the fact that a variable rate of interest loan is a fraud because as Dr Wilson states, the interest rate has to be certain to avoid fraudulent conveyance. These unfortunate Caucasian relatives of ours are having their properties stolen and then they are charged for the full amount of the unpaid balance which is fraudulently held very high through more fraud in low price sale of the property by the sheriff in collusion with the banksters. These folk need prayer! and lots of it. And powder and shot, too.
As I keep reminding you and your fellow officers, your primary and paramount duty is "to ensure that people can exercise their rights in court in safety" (from Sheriff of NSW website). Therefore, you are to blame for the banks stealing of our properties and the judges getting away with treasonously denying us our right to trial by jury. The banks and judges are using you to inflict their evil upon this country. Because of your "just following orders", people's lives have been and continue to be destroyed wrongly and illegally.
Instead of our courts having "the purpose in a civilized society of the vindication of men's rights and enforcement of just causes" (Lord Thomas Denning), you have allowed wickedness to prevail and have participated in the annihilation of English Common Law, Due Process and the Rule of Law. You are the instrument and the weapon of Tyranny.
On last Monday, you and a fellow officer trespassed in order to place a "Notice to Vacate" on my front screen door. My assistant (a lady who has now earned great praise from around the world for her loyalty) videoed a verbal exchange between us ...which, hopefully, will be on YouTube when a friend overcomes his technical difficulties. You said you didn't want to come here at 09:30 am on Tuesday 9 September 2008 but you were "just doing your job". I told you it is not your job to carry out unlawful orders from kangaroo courts and that your job is "to ensure that people can exercise their rights in court in safety". You went away, seemingly unconvinced.
On Tuesday 9 September I am putting on a "Sausage Sizzle" to celebrate Truth, Justice, Freedom and Democracy and have issued an open invitation to friends and patriots. Many people have sent apologies for not being able to be there and said they would be there in spirit.
I invite you and your fellow officers to come, as friends and patriots...but not as bad guys to "follow orders" and betray your families, friends, neighbours and country.
Another emailer suggested Tuesday 9 September be called "E-DAY" to revive the spirit of the Australian Freedom Fighters of the Eureka Stockade in 1853 who stood up for their rights against oppression. In 1854 there were six separate trials of the "rebels" when the British Governor wanted them hung for "High Treason"...but six separate Juries judged they had done no wrong, ie: that they were "NOT GUILTY". The Eureka Stockade is a beacon of Democracy.
Look into your conscience and do right...do your duty.....and know that all law hangs on loving God and loving your neighbour as yourself.
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
331 North Rocks Road,
North Rocks,
NSW 2151,
Australia.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
331 North Rocks Road,
North Rocks, NSW 2151.
3rd September, 2008.
The Presiding Magistrate,
Burwood Local Court,
7 Belmore Road,
Burwood, NSW 2134.
Dear Sir or Madam,
Re: “ARREST WARRANT” CASE/COURT REFERENCE NO 00106657/08/46
I was arrested by two Police officers from Castle Hill Police Station on the morning of 20th August 2008. I was transported (without a seatbelt inside a plastic box on the back of a Police vehicle) to castle Hill Police Station where I was fingerprinted, photographed, locked in a glass cell, etc. I was then transported the same way to Hornsby Local Court and imprisoned in the cells, there, brought before a Magistrate who directed I be transported to Burwood Local Court. Before going the Burwood Local Court I was imprisoned in Silverwater Gaol overnight and locked in a cell in the hospital, there. On Thursday, 21st August 2008, I was handcuffed, etc., and transported to Burwood Local Court and into the cells, there. At 1:00PM, I was taken into the Courtroom, there, and told I had to return to that Court on Tuesday 9th September 2008.
Today, I went to the Burwood Local Court to get a copy of the “ARREST WARRANT”. It says, “REASON FOR ARREST……DEFENDANT FAILED TO APPEAR AT THE Local Court BURWOOD on the 30/07/2008 TO ANSWER THE ABOVER OFFENCE(S) FOUND GUILTY/CONVICTED”.
This is NOT TRUE. Therefore , the ARREST was UNLAWFUL.
(1) I did make an appearance….a special appearance….at the Burwood Local Court on 30/07/2008. I have a copy of the transcript of that occasion when I demanded my inalienable Right to Trial by Jury and Challenged the Jurisdiction of the Court, when that legal Right was disregarded. Magistrate Dakin then disregarded this legal procedure and had me removed from the courtroom. In spite of having NO JURISDICTION to proceed summarily, he did just that IN MY ABSENCE AT HIS DIRECTION.
(2) I have not been “FOUND GUILTY/CONVICTED” because there was NOT A COURT OF PROPER JURISDICTION as there was NO JURY and I had never, at any stage, consented to be without a Jury. A “KANGAROO COURT” is defined as “a court which acts unfairly or dishonestly or disregards legal rights or disregards legal procedures”. The awards, doings and proceedings of such courts are not to be drawn into consequence or example. That court is NOT A COURT OF RECORD.
I truly want the matter of “Commissioner of Taxation v John WILSON” to go to trial in an ordinary and a proper court where Justice is administered….Justice being “the protection of rights and the punishment of wrongs”. Being a Freeman, with “liberty in Christ Jesus”, I can only be taken indeed imprisoned, dispossessed, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any manner destroyed, nor passed over, nor sent over, except by the legal judgment of my own equals indeed the law of the land.
No Act of Parliament can subvert or extirpate the laws and liberties of the People. Any Act of Parliament against Common Right is void.
R v the Magistrates of Sydney (1824) made it abundantly clear that there must be Trial by Jury even in a Magistrate’s Court.
The “BAIL CONDITIONS” which I signed, under the duress of being imprisoned, on 21st August 2008, are void.
By some “coincidence”, I have been served an UNLAWFUL “NOTICE TO VACATE” my property at 331 North Rocks Road, North Rocks for exactly the same time, 9:30 AM, on exactly the same day, 9th September 2008. Therefore, although I said that I wanted very much to be at Burwood Local Court because “Court is where we fight for our Rights”, I will be at 331 North Rocks Road, North Rocks on the morning of 9th September 2008.
Please contact me in order to arrange another time. My phone number at 331 North Rocks Road, North Rocks is (02) 9872 1661…or you can write to me asking me to phone the Registry of the Burwood Local Court, for the same purpose.
Be in no doubt, fighting for Truth, Justice, Freedom and Democracy is my passion … and I will definitely come to Burwood Local Court, to do just that
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
2nd September 2008
D-DAY DOWN UNDER - SAUSAGE SIZZLE
9th September, 2008. 7:00 AM
331 North Rocks Road, North Rocks.
BANK LOANS ARE FRAUD
FORECLOSURES ARE ILLEGAL
Variable interest rates render a contract void for uncertainty, ie: they are illegal under Common Law - which is the Law of the People, by the People and for the People.
A Freeman can only be dispossessed by the lawful judgment of a Jury (Magna Carta). This is our inalienable Right. Trial by Jury is Democracy because, in a Democracy, Sovereignty lies with the People – and Sovereignty is “the ultimate authority to make and impose laws”.
Common Law is made by the unanimous judgments of 12 Freemen gathered together as Jurors who ask, “So help me God”, in order that they can administer Justice – and Justice is “the protection of rights and the punishment of wrongs”.
No Parliament can make laws which take away the Rights of the People.
Kangaroo Courts are “courts which act unfairly or dishonestly or disregard legal rights or disregard legal procedures”. No Court has jurisdiction to proceed summarily (without a Jury) unless both parties consent to be without a Jury.
Writs of Possession awarded by the Kangaroo Courts of Australia are not to be drawn into consequence or example – they are illegal and void.
It is the primary and paramount duty of the Sheriff “to ensure that People can exercise their Rights in Court in safety”.
BUT, at 7:00 AM Tuesday 9 September 2008, the Sheriff will attempt to enforce an illegal Writ of Possession by using an equally illegal Notice to Vacate.
THIS OUTRAGE and ACT OF SHEER TREACHERY is being inflicted on hundreds of thousands of AUSTRALIAN FAMILIES.
The BANKS are CRIMINALS. The JUDGES are CORRUPT and the SHERIFFS are “just following orders”.
SO, COME TO THE CELEBRATION OF TRUTH, JUSTICE, FREEDOM & DEMOCRACY.
- John Wilson, www.rightsandwrong.com.au
----------------------------------------------------------------
2nd September 2008
Dear Fellow Australians,
WHY IS D-DAY DOWN UNDER , Tuesday 9 September, IMPORTANT?
Because it brings to the fore the abomination of AUSTRALIA FAMILIES being DESTROYED by the RAPACIOUS BANKS.
Bank LOAN CONTRACTS are simply and blatantly CRIMINAL.
Under COMMON LAW, VARIABLE INTEREST RATES render a contract void for UNCERTAINTY.
The contracts are ILLEGAL... and obtaining money by FRAUD is STEALING.
Signing a fraudulent document does not make it legal.
The "blanket" propaganda, through the media, that these fraudulent contracts are acceptable, is greatest lie intended to cause the greatest deprivation and suffering.
Some 300,000 AUSTRALIAN FAMILIES will be evicted UNLAWFULLY and MALICIOUSLY, this year.
Under COMMON LAW, (Magna Carta 1215, Petition of Right 1627, etc.), a FREEMAN can not be dispossessed unless by the lawful judgment of a JURY.
But AUSTRALIAN JUDGES have conspired with the Banks to deny TRIAL BY JURY, which is an inalienable RIGHT.
Writs of Possession are RUBBER STAMPED by AUSTRALIAN JUDGES in Australia's KANGAROO COURTS.
The SHERIFFS' sworn duty is "to ensure people can exercise their rights in court in safety"....but they have no idea what that means.
Consequently, the SHERIFFS uncaringly and brutally carry out the orders of the Banks and the Judges.
However, the SHERIFFS are the ACHILLES' HEEL.
Teach the SHERIFFS the TRUTH. Teach them to be HUMAN BEINGS.
Then the EVIL EMPIRE will FALL.
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au
----------------------------------------------------------------
1st September 2008
Dear Fellow Australians,
I have just had the expected visit from the Sheriffs from Parramatta. A video was taken and it will, hopefully, be on Youtube, a.s.a.p.
The "NOTICE TO VACATE" is dated for 09:30;00 AM Tuesday 9 September 2008.
Of course, there is NO CHANCE I'm going to surrender to these criminals and traitors, ie: to the "First Mortgage Company Home Loans Pty Ltd" (with their fraudulent loan contracts .... where variable interest rates render a contract void for uncertainty, etc. ) and the "Judges" (with their Kangaroo Courts...disregarding the Right to Trial by Jury and disregarding the legal procedure of Challenging the Jurisdiction of the Court).
The Sheriffs are disregarding their primary and paramount duty of "ensuring that people can exercise their Rights in Court in safety". They are nothing but mindless thugs "just following orders"...which is the "Defence" rejected at the Nuremberg Trials.
The Sheriff's Inspector Wayne Flexman says he doesn't want to be at my property on the 9th of September... but that, of course, is a lie. He and his partners-in-crime will be there ...and, I'm sure, they will have the NSW POLICE FORCE as re-enforcements. They will do to me what they have done, are doing, and will continue to do to hundreds of thousands of ordinary Australian families, who are victims of the Banks and the Judges.
Wayne Flexman (parr...@agd.gov.nsw.au ) has asked that I get a "STAY OF PROCEEDINGS" from the Courts so he "won't have to be here on September 9"....which he knows will never be granted by Australian "Judges", who are "frauds, liars, criminals, traitors and fools".
Therefore, 09:00:00 AM Tuesday 9 September 2008 is "D-Day".
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Sheriff of NSW,
Hornsby.
Fax: (02) 9847 9920.
Dear Sirs,
Re: Your primary and paramount duty.
It is on your own website that it is your primary and paramount duty to ensure that people can exercise their rights in court in safety.
I will be in the Hornsby Local Court on Monday 1st September 2008 and demanding to exercise my right to trial by jury.
Experience has taught me that Judges and Magistrates deny me that right. They do so unlawfully and maliciously. They order you, the Sheriff, to violate your sworn duty and assault me. They proceed summarily without my consent to be without a jury...which is, again, unlawful and malicious.
Attached is a leaflet, entitled "ATTENTION POLICE AND SHERIFFS", which I would like you to read.
I have a website, www.rightsandwrong.com.au , devoted to fighting for our rights and defeating the evils and injustices which have overtaken this country and We the People.
I call upon you to do right....which, if the Magistrate so offends, to arrest hi or her.
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ATTENTION: POLICE AND SHERIFFS.
DO YOU REALLY WANT TO BE USED TO DESTROY TRUTH, JUSTICE, FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY?
THAT’S WHAT THE BANKS AND JUDGES HAVE YOU DOING.
**********************
AUSTRALIANS ARE FREEMEN WITH AN INALIENABLE RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY - BECAUSE JURIES NULLIFY BAD LAWS THAT DESTROY OUR LAWS AND OUR LIBERTIES.
BANKS AND JUDGES HAVE SCHEMED FOR MANY YEARS TO STEAL OUR HERITAGE, OUR COUNTRY AND DESTROY OUR CHRISTIAN VALUES OF FAMILY AND COMMUNITY.
POLICE AND SHERIIFS ARE HOW THEY ENFORCE THEIR WILL ON US. THEY RELY ON POLICE AND SHERIFFS BEING BRAINWASHED AND INDOCTRINATED……NOT TO QUESTION WHAT THEY DO…..AND NOT TO OBEY THEIR CONSCIENCE WHEN ORDERED TO DO WRONG.
“WHAT DOES IT PROFIT A MAN TO GAIN THE WHOLE WORLD AND LOSE HIS OWN SOUL?”
WITHOUT YOU, THE EVIL BANKS AND JUDGES ARE POWERLESS.
WITHOUT YOU, THEIR EVIL LAWS ARE NOTHING.
STAY IN YOUR JOB AND DO RIGHT.
-Written by John Wilson, http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au
----------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Lionel & Toni,
Bill Hayden was a staunch "Republican" when put in to be "G.-G.". He soon found out the total fraud of the position (ie: no such Order from the Privy Council for the appointment, etc..) and was very quickly told to toe the "Establishment Line" and go along with the charade ..... which the Bankers exploit, in order to rape the country and subjugate the People ......with the elimination of our Rights being rubber-stamped by "Royal Assent".
"The lust for money is the root of all evil"....and the Bankers have that, in spades.
Now, a female Republican (a Quentin Bryce, or some such name) is to be the next Australian "Governor-General".
Only Bankers' stooges go into those "executive" positions. The same goes for "Judges"....all fraud....and State "Governors"....fraud, fraud, fraud.
It's one big scam....and as the Bill of Rights 1688 said, "evil counsellors, judges and ministers endeavouring to subvert and extirpate the laws and liberties of the people"
Anyway you look at it, it's straight-out Treason.
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
PS: In Hornsby Local Court, today, I accused a "Magistrate" (Leslie John Brennan) of denying me the Right to Trial by Jury...and he said, "Yes.". He also disregarded the legal procedure of my Challenging the Jurisdiction of the Court by saying he did have jurisdiction...to which I responded, "You can't judge in your own cause. That's against the Rules of Natural Justice". He treated the whole thing as a joke. Three female Sheriff's Officers sat in the courtroom, like zombies, refusing to do their duty, "to ensure that People can exercise their Rights in Court in safety", when I called upon them to arrest the so-called "Magistrate". JW.
PPS: When I was ordering the transcript in the Registry, I saw the "Magistrate" at the back wall talking to a clerk. I called out, "Leslie!" and he turned an looked at me. I then asked him, "How much money did you collect, this morning?". He did not answer, put his head down and walked quickly out through a rear exit JW.
--------------------------------------------------------
13th August 2008.
Dear Fellow Australians,
Dallas Kelso said to "The Honourable Justice" Anthony Johnson, "No Act of Parliament can take away my Rights." and was totally totally disregarded.
Yesterday in the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Dallas and Kerrie Kelso tried to present their case against Perpetual Limited (former known as Perpetual Trustees Australia Limited) ACN 000 431 827 and the Writ of Possession awarded to Perpetual Limited earlier.
Johnson J ignored all of the Affidavit Dallas and Kerrie had filed last week (a copy is attached to this email). Johnson J staunching would not allow the DVD annexed to the Affidavit to be shown in court (a good copy can be obtained from me or it can be viewed in bits on http://www.youtube.com:80/user/TakeBackYourHome ).
Johnson J, after persistent argument by Dallas, showed Dallas and Kerrie court documents relating to the Writ of Dispossession. Dallas asked that they be photocopied and an adjournment to give time to read them and get legal advice. Johnson J said "No".
Johnson J would not order Perpetual Limited to produce the original Loan Contract document and would not allow an adjournment for Dallas and Kerrie to file a Subpoena for it.
Johnson J put his head down and read out his "Judgment", quoting the Statute Laws which abolish the Right to Trial by Jury and quoting "Judgments" from other "Honourable Judges" endorsing the subverting and extirpation of our laws and liberties.
Before "proceedings " started, Kerrie said she wanted me as their Mackenzie's Friend. I then drew up a chair and sat at the "Bar Table" and Johnson J said I would not be allowed to speak. I wrote messages to Dallas on a foolscap pad and whispered occasionally.
When Johnson J had concluded his hatchet job, Dallas showed Johnson J a "Notice of Intention to Appeal - Form 103 (version 1) UCPR 51.6" and said he would go straight to the 5th floor Registry to file it. Johnson J said he could do that.
They filed the "Notice of Intention to Appeal", paid the filing fee, and walked to the extraordinarily plush offices of Gadens Lawyers to serve a copy.
Dallas phoned the Parramatta Office of the Sheriff of NSW and left a message of what had transpired that afternoon.
Now, Dallas and Kerrie have experienced the sheer arrogance and treachery of the Australian Judiciary.
Before going into court a television crew took some footage and did a very brief interview - but made no commitment as to putting it it air...however, they did say they were interested in a Public Meeting Dallas and Kerrie are about to organize for People in the Bankstown area very soon.
Dallas said to the television journalist, "No price is too high to pay for Justice.".
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Anna Bligh, MP,
Premier of Queensland.
Dear Madam,
Be aware that the changes proposed to the Jury system are nothing less than Treason.
Trial by Jury is Democracy.
In a Democracy, Sovereignty is with the People and they exercise that Sovereignty, ie: the ultimate authority to make and impose laws, by way of Trials by Juries when congregations of 12 Freemen make and impose Common Law. Common Law, ie: the law of the People, by the People and for the People, overrules Acts of Parliament which are against Common Right.
Trial by Jury is the Palladium of Liberty; the Bulwark of Freedom; the only Defence against Tyranny.
Sir William Blackstone said, " UPON these accounts the trial by jury even has been, and I trust ever will be, looked upon as the glory of the English law. And, if it has so great an advantage over others in regulating civil property, how much must that advantage be heightened, when it is applied to criminal cases! But this we must refer to the ensuing book of these commentaries: only observing for the present, that it is the most transcendent privilege which any subject can enjoy, or with for, that he cannot be affected either in his property, his liberty, or his person, but by the unanimous consent of twelve of his neighbours and equals. A constitution, that I may venture to affirm has, under providence, secured the just liberties of this nation for a long succession of ages. And therefore a celebrated French writer q, who concludes, that because Rome, Sparta, and Carthage have loft their liberties, therefore those of England in time must perish, should have recollected that Rome, Sparta, and Carthage, were strangers to the trial by jury."
Trial by Jury is an inalienable Right. No Judge can exercise any discretion over that Right. It is long established law that " In any action by consent of both parties the whole or any of the issues of fact may be tried, or any amount of any damages or compensation may be assessed by a Judge without a Jury". Which is to say that if a Memorandum of Consent to be without a Jury is signed by both parties to an action, only then does the Court have Jurisdiction to proceed summarily.
A "majority verdict" is not the verdict of a Jury. A Judgment must of the whole of the Jury, ie; unanimous, or there is no Judgment of any consequence or example.
Sir William Pitt once said, "Necessity is the excuse for every violation of liberty. It is the policy of tyrants and the creed of slaves." Any Judgment must be "beyond a reasonable doubt" or there is no Judgment. Judgments are given by Juries who judge the law and the facts of the matter brought before them (see: Sovereignty) so that they can administer Justice which is "the protection of rights and the punishment of wrongs". Juries pronounce sentences and awards damages...this is not lawfully done by Judges, unless by the consent of both parties.
Judges can not be Jurors because Jurors are the equals of Freemen. Judges are servants who swear to serve. Freemen do not serve anyone. Freemen are sui juris. Juries are "the law of the land".
Treason is a violation of allegiance. Parliamentarians and Judges have and swear allegiance to the People. When 'evil counsellors, judges and ministers.....endeavour to subvert and extirpate the laws and liberties of the People', that is Treason.
Treason is rife in the Parliaments and the Judiciary throughout Australia. Thomas Jefferson said "“The germ of destruction of our nation is in the power of the judiciary, an irresponsible body - working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall render powerless the checks of one branch over the other and will become as venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated.”.
TAKE NOTICE that We the People of Australia will not tolerate Treason.
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
331 North Rocks Road,
North Rocks, NSW 2151.
PS: The denial of the Right to Trial by Jury in any Court, eg: the Family Court, High Court, Supreme Court, Local Court, etc., is Treason.
----- Original Message -----
From: stat...@qld.gov.au
To: colc...@dodo.com.au
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 4:05 PM
Subject: PREMIER ANNOUNCES SIGNIFICANT NEW LAW REFORMS
Joint Statement:
Premier
The Honourable Anna Bligh
Attorney-General and Minister for Justice and Minister Assisting the Premier in Western Queensland
The Honourable Kerry Shine
18/08/2008
PREMIER ANNOUNCES SIGNIFICANT NEW LAW REFORMS
The State Government will introduce 'judge only' trials and majority verdicts for juries under proposed changes to Queensland's criminal justice system, Premier Anna Bligh announced today.
Ms Bligh said the reforms would help create a more robust and equitable justice system.
"One of the cornerstones of our legal system is that all persons brought before the courts should be able to receive a fair trial," Ms Bligh said.
"If at all possible, this should be a trial by a jury of one's peers.
"However, in a small number of cases, it may be useful to have a matter heard by a judge sitting alone. There may be cases that are of such complexity or such notoriety that a judge may be better placed to hear the matter.
Attorney-General and Minister for Justice Kerry Shine said a number of other states made provision for 'judge only' trials and that such a move was not out of step with national and international practice.
"The criminal justice system in Queensland must remain dynamic. Ensuring that we have mechanisms at hand to respond to a range of situations for both prosecution and defence is important," Mr Shine said.
"The system we are considering is similar to the model used in Western Australia where a 'judge only' trial can only take place after an application by either the prosecution or defence. Such an application will then be determined by a judge on the merits of the case.
"In trials where the prosecution applies for a 'judge only' trial, it will only proceed if the accused consents.
"We believe this initiative will ensure our system of justice can strike a greater balance between the rights of the accused, the right of victims of crime and the courts' capacity to ensure trials proceed in a timely and appropriate manner."
Ms Bligh and Mr Shine also announced that legislation would be amended to allow majority verdicts in some jury trials.
"The introduction of majority jury verdicts brings Queensland into line with the majority of other Australian jurisdictions and may also help reduce the number of hung juries in Queensland," she said.
"It would only be considered if a jury cannot reach a unanimous decision after a long deliberation - where one juror dissents after a deliberation of more than eight hours," she said.
"If at that time, after the judge considers the deliberations of the jury to be genuinely locked a majority verdict can be accepted by the court as long no more than one juror is in dissent.
"In the case of trials for the most serious criminal offences - which carry a mandatory life sentence - unanimous verdicts would be retained.
Mr Shine said the amendments to the Jury Act 2005 and the Criminal Code would be introduced into State Parliament next week.
18 August, 2008
Contact: Premier's office 3224 4500
==============================================================
Dear Allan,
Judges can not be Jurors because they are not the equals of Freemen.
They are servants ....servants of the Crown... and the Crown is the servant of the People...ie: "I swear to well and truly serve........".
Magna Carta says very very clearly that there must be "pares (the equal)" of a "Freeman".
What the Parliament can only do is pass Statute Laws which Common Law overrules.
Therefore, we must form People's Grand Juries and indict the traitors who would subvert and extirpate the laws and liberties of the People.
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
----- Original Message -----
From: Gopher
To: John Wilson
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 4:40 AM
Subject: Jury
John,
Last night on the state news Captain Bligh (Blight) the premier announced that they are going to grant Judges the right to be jurors and this will come into affect in a few months time. Dr. Patel wont get a fair trial is they don't do this. We are all sheep waiting to be slaughtered.
Allan
----------------------------------------------
18th August 2008
Tibor Karolyi,
Insolvency and Trustee Service Australia,
ABN 63 384 330 717,
Level 4, 201 Elizabeth Street,
Sydney, NSW 2000.
Dear Tibor,
YOU EVIL CREATURE.
You know perfectly well that the FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA (ABN: 60 265 617 271) is a KANGAROO COURT (ie: disregarding legal rights and disregarding legal procedures) and that any awards, doings and proceedings thereof are not to be drawn into consequence or example, ie: they are illegal and void. And yet, today, I have learnt that, on 25/07/2008, you contacted the WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION (ABN: 33 007 457 141) and they have cancelled my MASTERCARD (ABN: 95 108 603 345).
I have never been convicted...never been found guilty...of anything...NOTHING....never had TRIAL BY JURY.
You, and creatures like you, must have some sort of mental disorder for you to act without conscience... to simply (or perhaps with fiendish delight) do wrong.
You know what you are doing to your neighbour....do you know what you are doing to yourself?
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
----------------------------------------------------
Dear Ray,
That's some knockout video.
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
P.S. Got the Right to Trial by Jury back in Tassie, yet?
J.A.I.L.
(Juries Against Illegal Laws)
As you are aware, 5 men are committing suicide each day in Australia due to the results of State and Federal legislation dealing with Family Law. In Tasmania, the people are currently subject to the most draconian family law that has ever been legislated in the history of the world. The destruction of the family unit continues to be legendary.
Did you know, that last year in Victoria alone, that there were approximately 600 suicides by children. Most of these suicides are directly related to family break-ups. (source ABS) If you were to add up the total suicides in all the states of Australia you would soon realise that we have an epidemic of cruelty on our hands perpetuated by those who will stop at nothing to push down our throats illegal legislation with the purpose of meeting some sick and tormented view of a grand sociological experiment.
The Tasmanian Family Violence Act of 2004 is unlawful, it is (ultra vires) and is in direct contravention of the superior law of Australia, called the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution.
The long term psychological effects on our children is vile mental cruelty to the extreme.
I hope you have a brief moment to watch this video presentation. How far would you go to protect and love your children? Will you continue to accept a law which is evil and destroys families?
If you know someone who has suffered from a result of the Family Law Court or the draconian Tasmanian Family Violence Act of 2004, please tell them about us. Please also ask people to join J.A.I.I.L who are supporters of the Aussie family.
A son asked his Dad, "Will you take part in a marathon with me?" The father, despite the fact that he has a heart condition, said yes. They went on to complete the marathon together. Father and son went on to join other marathons, the father always saying yes to his son's request of going through the race together. One day, the son said, "Dad, let's do the Ironman together." To which his father said once again, yes.
For those who didn't know, the "Ironman" is the toughest triathlon of them all. The race encompasses three endurance events: a 2.4 mile (3.86 kilometre) ocean swim, followed by a 112 mile (180.2 kilometre) bicycle ride, and ending with a 26.2 mile (42.195 kilometre) marathon along the coast of the Big Island in Hawaii.
Father and son went on to complete the race together. View this:
Click Here to view the video of the duo: http://www.godtube.com/view_video.php?viewkey=8cf08faca5dd9ea45513
Father, when I received this e-mail, I thought...
I don't have time for this... And, this is really inappropriate during working days.
Then, I realized that this kind of thinking is exactly, what has caused lot of the problems in our world today.
We try to keep Messiah in church on Sabbath...
Maybe, Sunday ... and, the unlikely event of a midweek service.
We do like to have Him around during sickness....
And, of course, at funerals.
However, we don't have time, or room, for Him during work or play...
Because... that's the part of our lives we think... We can, and should, handle on our own.
May God forgive me for ever thinking...
that there is a time or place where HE is not to be FIRST in my life.
We should always have time to remember all HE has done for us.
Jesus said, "If you are ashamed of me, I will be ashamed of you before my Father."
Yes, I do Love God.
HE is our source of existence and our Saviour.
He keeps us functioning each and every day. Without Him, we are nothing. But, with Christ, HE strengthens us. (Phil 4:13)
Kindest Regards,
Ray Escobar
“Lest We Forget”
J.A.I.L
Phone: 0488 345963
Email: rjescobar1 @ bigpond.com
Secretary
14 Thelma Street
Launceston 7250
Comments
I want to help you in any way I can John
Dear Joanne,
The more Aussie P.M. Kevin Rudd keeps begging to give the banksters money, the more he shows where he's coming from, ie: the camp of the banksters.
As long as we retain Trial by Jury in both its forms (Grand & Petit), we can straigthen the ship (possibly an ironic turn of phrase).
What ought to happen is the complete cancellation of the mortgages and not pay the banksters anything...ie: no more debt and no increase in debt....and establish a truly National Bank along the lines of the original Commonwealth Bank of Australia set up by King O'Malley at the beginning of the 20th century (ie: extinguishable debt).
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
----- Original Message -----
From:
To: jhwilson @ rightsandwrong.com.au
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 11:46 AM
Subject: I want to help you in any way I can John
Hi John,
I love your site and information - I want to support and help your cause in any way I can.
Right now I am sooo ANGRY about the bloody American Government trying to bail out the money hungry companies .. and I am actually relieved the bid failed... am I the only person happy about this?????
WHY should they try and bail these money hungry companies out???? .
....................................................
Doesn't anybody realise that the banks and lending institutions caused this whole problem in the first place by allowing high risk loans to high risk customers.
Everyone in the world today is living on "chits" or credit no one has any cash money it's all gonna crash big time. America will lead the way they always do.
I wish us Aussies would stop sticking our heads in the sand and realise that the truth is being hidden from us all by the Banks and Judges and Governments of this country.
I am telling EVERYONE I KNOW to Check out the truth below:
http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au/
Honestly - pack your bags everyone because we all might have to leave suddenly and owning nothing but OWING everything
John let me know if there is anything I can do to support your cause in the Port Stephens / Newcastle area.
Sincerely
Joanne xxxxxx
Insolvency Trustees, Government Solicitors and Uncle Tom Cobbly
John Kennedy,
Client Relations Co-ordinator (Acting)
Insolvency and Trustee Service Australia
National Office
Canberra
Telephone : (02) 6270 3430
Facsimile: (02) 6270 3423
mail to :john.kennedy @ itsa.gov.au ,
Dear John Kennedy,
You are "just following orders" .......the Nuremberg Defence which didn't hold water.
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
----- Original Message -----
From: Kennedy, John
To: jhwilson @ rightsandwrong.com.au
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 2:47 PM
Subject: Internet complaint dated 02 October 2008
03 October 2008
Mr John Wilson
jhwilson @ rightsandwrong.com.au
Dear Mr Wilson
I acknowledge receipt of your internet complaint dated 02 October 2008.
This office is not in a position to assist you in this matter.
Yours sincerely
John Kennedy
Client Relations Co-ordinator (Acting)
Insolvency and Trustee Service Australia
National Office
Canberra
Telephone : (02) 6270 3430
Facsimile: (02) 6270 3423
mail to :john.kennedy @ itsa.gov.au
Kelvin Boateng,
Lawyer,
Australian "Government" Solicitor,
Level 42,
MLC Centre,
19 Martin Place,
Sydney, NSW 2000.
Dear Kelvin,
Re: Your Ref's 07036789 & 08121087 letters dated 26 September 2008.
Both these letters are further testamony to the TREASON that has overtaken the Administration of Australia. Ever Public Servant participating is GUILTY.
Australia is a DEMOCRACY and TRIAL BY JURY IS DEMOCRACY.
Australian Parliaments and the Judiciary are endeavouring to subvert and extirpate the laws and liberties of the People by the attempted extirpation of the People's RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY -which is inalienable. The People of Australia have the RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY ACTION - and to deny it is TREASON.
I have been denied this RIGHT in Australians Court for over 12 years in every action when I have been either the Plaintiff or the Defendant. The proceedings you refer to are examples of this fact. Awards, doings and proceedings when the RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY have been disregarded are not to be drawn into consequence or example, ie: they are illegal, null and void. Trying to enforce Judgments from such KANGAROO COURTS is a heinous offence and those committing the atrocity must be brought to JUSTICE.
"Trial by Jury is the Palladium of Liberty." "Trial by Jury is the only anchor yet imagined by man that can hold a government to the principles of its constitution." "Trial by Jury is the Bulwark of Freedom." "Trial by Jury is the only defence against Tyranny."...and so go famous quotes from our ancestors who were honourable men.
The injustices and wrongful suffering caused by "evil counsellors, judges and ministers" with the denial of the RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY, are intolerable. Only by keeping People in the dark and feeding them lieing propaganda, does the TREACHERY continue. "The only way that evil can triumph is for good men to do nothing."
So, what you can do with your menaces is put a match to them...because TRUTH, JUSTICE, FREEDOM and DEMOCRACY will be restored to our country,,,and the TRAITORS will be imprisoned.
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
Copies to Federal Court of Australia & Insolvency and Trustee Service of Australia.
Re: John Wilson Is In Jail - "The Rules" by John Wilson
21st September 2008
THE RULES
LEVELS OF JURISDICTION:
(i) THEOCRACY – God Rules;
(ii) DEMOCRACY – People Rule and make Common Law.
(iii) BUREACRACY – Officials Rule and make Statute Law.
Judges, Parliamentarians, Sheriffs, Police, etc., are inferior to and servants of the People. No Parliament can make legislation to take away the Rights of the People. “Common law doth control Acts of Parliament and adjudges them when against common right to be void” (Coke).
People exercise their Sovereignty, ie: their ultimate authority to make and impose laws, by way of the unanimous judgments of Juries, who are congregations of 12 Freemen asking “So help me God” in order for them to administer Justice.
Trial by Jury is an inalienable Right. No court has jurisdiction to proceed summarily without the consent of both parties to be without a Jury. Courts are places where Justice administered, ie: where rights are protected and wrongs punished. “The purpose of a court in a civilized society is the vindication of men’s rights and the enforcement of just causes” (Denning).
The denial of the Right to Trial by Jury is Treason - and punishable by imprisonment for life.
It is the sworn primary and paramount duty of the Sheriffs “to ensure that People can exercise their rights in court in safety”.
“No free man shall be seized indeed imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any other way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgement of his equals indeed by the law of the land. To no one will we sell, to no one deny or delay right or justice.” (Magna Carta – an entrenched Australian Constitutional Enactment).
“The Truth will make us Free” (Holy Bible).
- Written by John Wilson, http://www,rightsandwrong.com.au
Re: John Wilson Is In Jail - YOU ARE DEAD WRONG ABOUT ONE THING
YOU ARE DEAD WRONG ABOUT ONE MAJOR THING, JOHN
and you are either too proud or too stupid to admit it.
You are living in a DEMOCRACY that changes the rules as it sees fit.
Otherwise you would NOT BE IN THE INVIDIOUS POSITION YOU ARE IN NOW.
FIND: REPUBLIC vs. DEMOCRACY
Read and Learn, fool!: http://www.1215.org/lawnotes/lawnotes/repvsdem.htm and http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1143.htm
Exposé
"Government is not reason; it is not eloquence; it is force!
Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master."
--George Washington
There are three kinds of people in the world:
* Those who do what they're told without question,
* Those who control them, and-
* Those who refuse to play that game - ENVIED AND HATED BY THE OTHER TWO.
Copula eame se non posit acceptara jocularem.
-----------------------------------------------------------
4th June 2008
Attorney RETAINER is and is only a GIFT and a Donation
Did any ATTORNEY ever ask you for a $________.00 for a RETAINER????
Did that ATTORNEY tell you that a RETAINER was and is only a GIFT and a DONATION????
Did that ATTORNEY tell you that he or she is NOT obligated to do any work for you on your case for the $5,000.00 to $10,000.00 RETAINER that you just gave them thinking that you just gave them a DOWN PAYMENT to WORK ON YOUR CASE????
A "retainer" is a sum of money paid by a client to secure an attorney's availability to work for a client.
The fee paid is considered earned at the time of payment because the attorney is entitled to the money regardless of whether he actually performs any services for the client, and the funds shall not be placed into the attorneys trust account. Baranowski v. State Bar, 154 Cal.Rptr. 752, 593 P.2d 613 (1979); and the Washington State Bar News, Committee Reports, Formal Opinion No. 173.
The California Court in Baranowski v. State Bar, supra, clearly stated that: A "RETAINER IS A SUM OF MONEY PAID BY A CLIENT TO SECURE AN ATTORNEYS AVAILABILITY TO WORK FOR A CLIENT."
A RETAINER only pays for the AVAILABILITY of the attorney.
The FACT is that when you make an appointment to talk to an attorney for a DUI, traffic ticket, domestic violence, driving without a license, driving while intoxicated, negligent driving or any other kind of case, they meet with you, they let you TALK for about 5 to 10 to 15 minutes and then they ask you for a $3,000.00 to $5,000.00 to a $10,000.00 or more as a RETAINER so that you can secure their availability only!
The California Court in Baranowski v. State Bar, supra, clearly stated that . . .
"THE FEE PAID IS CONSIDERED EARNED AT THE TIME OF PAYMENT BECAUSE THE ATTORNEY IS ENTITLED TO THE MONEY REGARDLESS OF WHETHER HE ACTUALLY PERFORMS ANY SERVICES FOR THE CLIENT, . . . and the funds shall NOT be placed into the attorneys trust account."
Wow, the attorneys are so stuck up and think that they are so above us "peons" or "goi dogs"that you have to pay them for merely "gracing you with their presence" and that they consider the RETAINER earned at the time you are dumb enough to give it to them REGARDLESS OF WHETHER HE OR SHE ACTUALLY PERFORMS ANY SERVICES FOR THE CLIENT!!!!
WANT TO KNOW MORE ABOUT THE TRAFFIC SCAM????
ARE YOU TIRED OF BEING RIPPED OFF BY ATTORNEYS WHO ARE ALL MEMBERS IN GOOD STANDING OF THE VERY SAME BAR ASSOCIATION THAT ALL THE PROSECUTORS AND JUDGES ARE MEMBERS OF????
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4th June 2008
PROOF THAT AN ATTORNEYS RETAINER IS A 100% RIP OFF!
The following case PROVES that an ATTORNEYS RETAINER is merely a GIFT or a DONATION: A “retainer” is a sum of money paid by a client to secure an attorney’s availability to work for a client.
The fee paid is considered earned at the time of payment because the attorney is entitled to the money regardless of whether he actually performs any services for the client, and the funds shall not be placed into the attorneys trust account.
Baranowski v. State Bar, 154 Cal.Rptr. 752, 593 P.2d 613 (1979); and the Washington State Bar News, Committee Reports, Formal Opinion No. 173.
The California Court in Baranowski v. State Bar, supra, clearly stated that: A “RETAINER IS A SUM OF MONEY PAID BY A CLIENT TO SECURE AN ATTORNEYS AVAILABILITY TO WORK FOR A CLIENT.”
A RETAINER only pays for the availability of the attorney.
The FACT is that when you make an appointment to talk to an attorney for a DUI, traffic ticket, domestic violence, driving without a license, driving while intoxicated, negligent driving or any other kind of case, they meet with you, they let you TALK for about 5 to 10 to 15 minutes and then they ask you for a $3,000.00 to $5,000.00 to a $10,000.00 or more as a RETAINER so that you can secure their availability only!
The California Court in Baranowski v. State Bar, supra, clearly stated that . . . THE FEE PAID IS CONSIDERED EARNED AT THE TIME OF PAYMENT BECAUSE THE ATTORNEY IS ENTITLED TO THE MONEY REGARDLESS OF WHETHER HE ACTUALLY PERFORMS ANY SERVICES FOR THE CLIENT, . . . and the funds shall NOT be placed into the attorneys trust account.”
Did you know that most attorneys and law firms keep TWO (2) SETS OF BOOKS?
1.) The first RECEIPT BOOK that they DESTROY is the RECEIPT BOOK for RETAINERS and they are NOT reporting RETAINERS as INCOME????).
2.) The second RECEIPT BOOK is the ONE (1) book and record that they are REQUIRED to keep for accepting A FEE which is the ONLY INCOME that attorneys or law firms are reporting to THE IRS!!!!
THIS ALSO COULD BE PROOF THAT ATTORNEYS ARE NOT PAYING THEIR FAIR SHARE OF INCOME TAXES BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT KEEPING ALL THE REQUIRED BOOKS AND RECORDS OR PROOF OF 100% OF ALL THEIR INCOME!!!!
A RETAINER is NOT the same thing as a FEE to do some work on your case!
An ATTORNEYS RETAINER is ONLY a GIFT or DONATION.
When you have given any ATTORNEY or LAW FIRM any MONEY towards any RETAINER, you have NOT hired them to do any WORK on your case!!!!
The ATTORNEYS or LAW FIRMS got your first RETAINER as a GIFT or DONATION, but you have NOT hired them to do any work on your case yet!
Now if you want an ATTORNEY or LAW FIRM to do some WORK on your case, you will have to PAY A FEE and sign a contract stating what services he will provide for you and state how much more he or she will charge you to REPRESENT you at trial and then AFTER you have PAID his or her FEE, then they will file a NOTICE OF APPEARANCE in your case.
HIRE LUIS EWING TO WORK ON YOUR CASE INSTEAD OF GIVING DONATIONS & GIFTS TO ATTORNEYS & LAW FIRMS TO DO ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ON YOUR CASE!
Luis Ewing at (253) 226-3741 or rcwcodebuster @ comcast.net or rcwcodebuster @ yahoo.com or rcwcodebuster @ gmail.com or rcwcodebuster @ hotmail.com
Re: John Wilson In Jail - Sheriffs Can Be Charged With Treason
21st September 2008
Just a copy of what I sent to the Burwood Sheriff's Office on John's behalf.
Good luck John - Debra
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Debra Bentley
Date: Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 10:05 AM
Subject: Know & understand the Law for all concened
To: burwoodsheriff @ agd.nsw.gov.au
Dear Sheriff & Officers,
In the matter of Mr John Wilson - he is absolutely right and you can be held accountable for your actions against him. Not only under Commonwealth Law but also International Law.
I understand you may not be aware of the Law so I have included a section of Mr Sharkey's trial under Sedition Law in Australia. You may also add Subversion / Treason to this if you continue to behave in this manner. I encourage you to read, learn and understand the Law so you can uphold Australia's Democracy values and you will not treat others unjustly in future.
I have included some other excerpts for your interest as well.
From Sharkey's Trial in Australia.....
The indictment was laid under Section 24D of, the Commonwealth Crimes Act 1914-1946. Section 24D makes it an indictable offence for a person to write, print, utter or publish any seditious words, the penalty for which is imprisonment for three years. Section 24B of the same act states that seditious words are "words expressive of a seditious intention."
But the explanation of what is a seditious intention appears in Section 24A of this act which makes any of the following intentions seditious:
(a) to bring the Sovereign into hatred or contempt;
(b) to excite disaffection against the Sovereign or the Government or Constitution of the United Kingdom or against either House of the Parliament of the United Kingdom;
(c) to excite disaffection against the Government or Constitution of any of the King's Dominions;
(d) to excite disaffection against the Government or Constitution of the Commonwealth or against either House of the Parliament of the Commonwealth;
(e) to excite disaffection against the connexion of King's Dominions under the Crown;
(f) to excite His Majesty's subjects to attempt to procure the alteration otherwise than by lawful means, of any matter in the Commonwealth established by law of the Commonwealth; or
"(g) to promote feelings of ill-will and hostility between different classes of His Majesty' s subjects so as to endanger the peace, order or good government of the Commonwealth,"
It is important, however, to note that this same section, 24A, goes on to say that it shall be lawful for any person:
"(a) to endeavour in good faith to show that the Sovereign has been mistaken in any of his counsels;
"(b) to point out in good faith errors or defects in the Government or Constitution of the United Kingdom or any of the King's Dominions or of the Commonwealth as by law established, or in legislation, or in the administration of justice. with a view to the reformation of such errors or defects;
"(c) to excite in good faith His Majesty's subjects to attempt to procure by lawful means the alteration of any matter in the Commonwealth as by law established; or
"(d) to point out in good faith in order to their removal any matters which are producing or have a tendency to produce feelings of ill-will and hostility between different classes of His Majesty's subjects."
Therefore if Sharkey's words were "to point out in good faith errors or defects in the Government of the Commonwealth or in the administration of justice with a view to their reformation of such errors or defects" he should not have been convicted under the Crimes Act.
NOW DO YOU UNDERSTAND? 'TO DISAFFECT A PERSON SO THAT HE IS IN A POSITION WHERE HE WILL NOT DEFEND HIS 'KING' OR COUNTRY IS ALSO AN ACT OF SUBVERSION'.......= TREASON !!!!
From the International Court..........
ENFORCEMENT OF INJUSTICE BY GOVERNMENT PERSONNEL IS AN ILLEGAL PUNISHABLE ACT (cf. The Nuremberg Precedent).
At all times, every adult person has the moral and legal responsibility to suppress injustice. Every act of injustice is a common law crime, whether committed by private citizens or by the state (government). Jurors and government employees alike are accountable. See Principles, U.N., 12-10-1946, ratified by all Western governments:
PRINCIPLE IV: "The fact that a person acted pursuant to the order of his government or a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him."
Whether by participation in the enforcement of arbitrary legislation, or from the following of direct orders, being party to the execution of an injustice is a criminal offence (cf. Crime Against Humanity).
De jure [under the law], under pain of penalisation, all those involved at every stage of the creation, maintenance and enforcement of law, must make the moral choice and judge the law and their own actions in relation to the law, and accordingly make the apposite decision.
TRIAL BY JURY IS INIMITABLE.
Citizen-Juries educated and instructed to judge on the justice of law and its enforcement, can be relied upon to protect people from the state, when the state breaches correct behaviour in attempting to enforce injustices. It is for this reason that those who stand to gain money and/or power from tyranny by the imposition of unjust 'laws', regard the genuine Trial by Jury as an obstacle to be undermined and destroyed. Untrustworthy at best, of outright criminal intent at worst, are those who, instead of restoring Common Law Trial by Jury to its true form, would discard it altogether.
Legislators and judges are exposed to all the temptations of money, fame and power, to induce them firstly, to overlook and deliberately disregard justice in the framing, passing, interpreting and enforcing of legislation; and secondly, to become actively biased between contesting litigants, causing politicians and judges to sell the rights and interests, and violate the liberties of the People. Jurors are exposed to none of these temptations.
Quote from Cicero -
"A nation can survive its' fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and he carries his banners openly. But the traitor moves among those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the galleys, heard in the very hall of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor--He speaks in the accents familiar to his victims, and wears their face and their garment, and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation--he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city--he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to be feared.
"Cicero, 42 B.C., Roman Statesman, orator, and author.
Have a nice day.
Regards
Debra Bentley
Re: John Wilson Is In Jail - Dear Sheriff, Reply From Nick JW
Thanx JW,
In response to your posting 18th September 2008 - Dear Sheriff
These imbalanced thugs/cops/sheriffs are screened for "free-thinking" ability in their piggy schools. If they show too much intelligence, they are culled, and replaced with insecure, psychotics with a need to fill the void in their lives with a uniform, and thus power over others. These bureaucratic positions attract the fat and stoooopid in droves!!!! Nick.
Having To File A Requisition For Trial By Jury Is Totally Wrong
Dear Leslie,
Having to file a Requisition for Trial by Jury is totally wrong... it is the trickery employed by these traitors to deceive the unknowing.
Trial by Jury is an inalienable Right...it is NOT a privilege some official can condescendingly decide to allow. This Right is part-n-parcel of and essential to Democracy (see attachment on Levels of Jurisdiction, ie: 1.Theocracy (God Rules); 2. Democracy (People Rule); and 3. Bureaucracy (Officials Rule)). People do not rule God and Officials do not rule People.
Once you step into a Court, there must be Trial by Jury. If you don't want Trial by Jury, you must sign and file a Memorandum of Consent to be without a Jury...otherwise, the Court has no Jurisdiction to proceed summarily.....and is a Kangaroo Court and not a Court of Record.
Lawyers and Judges will tell you the opposite...which is why our Courts have ceased to be places where Justice is administered, ie: where rights and protected and wrongs punished.
Judges must never be given nor allowed to assume absolute power whereby they can conceal their own incompetence, corruption and treachery.
If you don't immediately get a Jury, then Challenge the jurisdiction of the Court...a legal procedure which brings about a peremptory, mandatory and absolute Stay of Proceedings until the jurisdiction is determined by a Special Jury...ie: a Jury will decided if you have the Right to Trial by Jury.
We are at this point in history when we either fight back or go down.
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
-----------------------------
LEVELS OF JURISDICTION
OR
THE RULES OF THE GAME
It is the game of “World Control”. It is a serious game and the stakes are the highest imaginable, because we stand to lose our Rights to “Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness”. In the 18th century, when the American Colonies were suffering at the hands of a despotic King, they knew what they were entitled to under English Common Law which has, as it’s foundation, the Charters of Liberty such as Magna Carta 1215, Petition of Right 1627, Habeas Corpus 1640 and the Bill of Rights 1688, and that “the glory of English law” (as Sir William Blackstone wrote) has always been Trial by Jury. For megalomaniacs to take over the world, they must first dispose of these icons which have indelibly confirmed the Order and the Rule of Law according to the Christian perspective. If we are going to defeat the Forces of Evil, we need to understand and hold to the Levels of Jurisdiction.
THE RULE OF LAW
“The supremacy of law. A feature attributed to the UK constitution by Professor Dicey (Law of the Constitution, 1885). It embodied three concepts: the absolute predominance of regular law, so that the government has no arbitrary authority over the citizen; the equal subjection of all (including officials) to the ordinary law administered by the ordinary courts; and the fact that the citizen’s personal freedoms are formulated and protected by the ordinary law rather than by abstract constitutional declarations.”
(Oxford Reference, A Dictionary of Law, Oxford University Press)
WHO IS THE LAW?
The Latin word, “iuris”, is translated into English as meaning “law, right, justice; law court; jurisdiction, authority”. In the movie, “The Verdict”, the actor, Paul Newman, stands in front of the Jury and says to them, “You are the law.”. A Jury is made up of 12 men and women who are the equals of the men and women who are the plaintiffs and defendants in a court action, and have been brought together to judge the laws and the facts presented to them.
IT’S ALL A QUESTION OF SOVEREIGNTY
Sovereignty is the ultimate authority to make and impose laws.
WHO HAS SOVEREIGNTY OVER WHOM AND WHAT?
That is to say, WHO rules? In a THEOCRACY, GOD rules. In a DEMOCRACY, People rule. In a BUREACRACY, officials rule. And, it’s all a matter of seniority or, in other words, superiority in standing.
AT Level One: GOD over Man:-
GOD created Man. GOD is superior to Man, ie: to a natural person.
AT Level Two: Man over Parliament:-
Man created Parliament. Man is superior to Parliament, ie: to an artificial person
AT Level Three: Parliament over Corporations:-
Parliament creates Corporations. Parliament is superior to Corporations, ie: to artificial persons
AT Level Four: Corporations over nothing:-
Corporations create nothing. Corporations are superior to nothing and inferior to everything.
In brief, and using the symbol, “>”, to denote “is superior to”, we have:-
GOD > Man > Parliament > Corporations.
*******************************
Definitions:-
(i) natural = product of nature; not man-made or artificial.
(ii) artificial = made by human skill or labour; not natural.
(iii) Natural Law = law based on the natural tendency of human beings to exercise right reason in dealing with others. Natural law precedes and is regarded as the basis of common law.
*******************************
Comments:-
(i) Even Judges recognize the application of SUPERIORITY, eg: in the functioning of the Court System Superior Courts have the jurisdiction/ power to overrule Inferior Courts.
(ii) Parliaments create the Courts and Judges, which leaves:- Man > Judges.
(iii) A Man cannot sit in judgment of another Man, but GOD has made provision for a congregation, ie: a Jury, to do so.
(iv) A Man, being a natural person, cannot be a Corporation, ie: an artificial person. Therefore, Judges can never be “> Man” and to allow Judges to judge a Man, because that would be incompatible with the sequence of SUPERIORITY.
(v) “Hominum caus jus constitum est” - a legal maxim translates to “Law is established for the benefit of man”. This is the prime objective of the Law.
(vi) Another legal maxim says, “Nemo admittendis est inhabilitare seipsum” which translates to “No one is allowed to incapacitate himself”. Therefore, a Man (ie: a natural person) cannot be an artificial person, which would incapacitate him and deny him of his Right, as a Freeman, to Trial by Jury.
(vii) Still more legal maxims say such things as, “When laws imposed by the State fail, we must act by the Law of Nature”, “The Law punishes falsehood”, “The more common the evil, the worse”, “The greatest enemies to Peace are force and wrong”,.....and, of course, “Rights never die”.
(viii) Magna Carta put it correctly by saying “No Freeman shall be.... unless by the legal judgment of his own equals indeed the law of the land.”
(ix) So, when a Man goes into a court and the Magistrate or Judge tries to make out that he has jurisdiction over you, you tell him, “You are at Level Three in the ‘pecking order’. I am at Level Two. I have jurisdiction over you – not you over me. I have the inalienable Right to Trial by Jury - and, if I don’t want to avail myself of a Jury, I’ll give my consent to that effect. Until then, do not exceed your jurisdiction.”
************************************
THE LEVELS OF JURISDICTION/SOVEREIGNTY ARE:-
1. GOD or THEOCRACY where GOD rules.
2. MAN or DEMOCRACY where People rule.
3. PARLIAMENT or BUREAUCRACY where Officials rule.
4. CORPORATIONS where these entities rule nothing.
************************************
THE NEW WORLD ORDER:-
So that the World may be ruled by Officials, it is necessary to eliminate Levels 1 and 2 in the psyche of Man, with orchestrated, insidious and determined programs of propaganda and prohibition. The “evil counsellors, judges and ministers”, described in the Bill of Rights 1688, are once again systematically undermining and eliminating the laws and the liberties of the People.
The Media and the Schools are playing their parts in these programs of disinformation and mischief to mislead us and our children by devaluing morals and crushing our ability to be free and sovereign human beings.
In the USA, many have been duped into surrendering Sovereignty to their elected representatives under the illusion of having a “Republic”, ie: they have been drawn into believing that Acts of Parliament overrule their own Common Law. In Courts, “evil counsellors and judges” reinforce this deception by proclaiming categorically that, “Statute Law overrules Common Law” .... in other words that, “Level 3 Law overrules Level 2 Law”.
Our Courts are where we must fight to protect and preserve our Rights. The “evil counsellors and judges” have no intention of honouring their Oaths of Office, which is to “well and truly serve” the Queen (ordained by Coronation) and to “do right to all manner of people”, but are totally embroiling in the Drive for a New World Order. It is their role to eliminate Level 1 and Level 2 Sovereignty and have themselves, as Level 3 persons, with power over us. By relegating People to Level 4 impotence, by invoking their Level 3 Admiralty/Commercial Law in our Courts, the legal piranhas wreak their destruction.
We must never forget that GOD has given us this Level 2 Jurisdiction....this gift of Service. If we deny this gift, or say that this gift is not important, we are actually insulting and disobeying GOD.
If we are going to love GOD and love our neighbours as ourselves, we have no choice but to fight the Forces of Evil because “the only way for evil to triumph is that good men do nothing” (Edmund Burke 1729 – 1797).
- Written by John Wilson, http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au
Re: John Wilson Is In Jail - A Message From Col Candy
Dear Arthur and Fiona,
Thank you for advising me of John's unfortunate predicament, and I have taken the liberty of forwarding the message onto the media.
Arthur and Fiona, Please pass on my condolences to John's dear wife.
Best regards Col Candy
Re: John Wilson Is In Jail - Comment From Pierre Free Man
When is John going to learn that his trail by jury only applies in a non-admiralty non-martial jurisdiction?
It is not that he is wrong with what he preaches but he preaches in the wrong venue/jurisdiction!!!
He is so to speak casting pearls before swine and sooner rather than lately he has to realise there are other ways to go to the other side of the brick wall than banging your head against it.
Some times it is as simple as going around the corner and walking through the unlocked side door ie the narrow gate rather than battering at the fortified double laminated steel plated main door which was nothing more than a distraction??
Anyway. I have offered in good faith my 20 cents worth.
Pierre Free Man
Not a crown created corp-oration "dead speaking" sole .... but .... an immortal living breathing soul
ciao for now from Pierre
ze aeronaughty aeronaut
Re: John Wilson Is In Jail - Reply From John Wilson To Pierre
Dear Pierre,
These are OUR COURTS.
They are COMMON LAW COURTS.
If criminals and traitors think they can take OUR COURTS away from us, we've got to step into the arena and defeat the mongrels.
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
Re: John Wilson Is In Jail - Reply From Wolter J to John Wilson
With respect John,
In a democracy, and you continuously talk about democracy, there is no common law. There is only civil law, civil compliance, and civil courts. Accept that you are only mind-conditioned to accept that democracy is good and allows you to participate in government. However the truth is, democracy is the rule of a controlled and manipulated mob. Man is not to rule over man for that constitutes slavery.
Democracy is your reward for allowing yourself to be labelled a "citizen" of the State and is your punishment for not standing up for your subject status and your true Sovereign. A subject is someone who is under the single authority of the Crown, which represents your Prime Creator, not to be misinterpreted to be your queen. You are only mind-conditioned that the Crown is the queen, or is the queen and parliament, or queen and government. WRONG, the queen is only representing the Crown as the Governor represents the queen. Only the queen acting in the name of the Prime Creator can govern and or sit in judgment of the Prime Creator delivering natural justice.
It is only as a subject that you enjoy natural birthrights such as common law, common law courts, common wealth, and natural justice. Natural justice is for natural (living) things. All that which is created by the Prime Creator, who some call Almighty God.
The electoral laws mandate it compulsory for all Australian citizens to vote. Hence those who vote at elections accept and consent to be citizens. A citizen is a corporate entity (not a natural living being) created by the State. Hence the State becomes your Sovereign. Goodbye natural birthrights, goodbye common law, common law courts, natural justice and common wealth. All is owned and controlled by the State and the State is your Sovereign master who must be obeyed and is your false king, described under the Bible
Fortunately the power to define an Australian citizen was explicitly denied by the Framers to the Federal Parliament at the third Convention at Melbourne, 1898. A motion by Dr John Quick LLb (co-author of the Annotated Constitution of the Australian Commonwealth (often referred to as "Quick and Garran") seeking that power was voted against and thus was explicitly denied. This is not open to interpretation, it is a recorded fact which was further upheld and dealt with under Quick & Garran.
Therefore, if you wish to claim your natural birthrights renounce your citizenship and stand up for your subject status. Make sure that you do not vote, because that is only compulsory for Australian citizens according to the electoral act. Of course the act is unconstitutional for being ultra vires and thus is void ab initio by operation of law. Anyone who seeks to impose a penalty and uphold the act is open to a charge of treason pursuant to s.24 AA of the Crimes Act 1914. Also ss. 5, 6, 7, and 15 D are equally applicable.
Instead of continuously complaining, take off your blinkers John. Re-discover de jure authority. You have been like a stuck record for years - "let's put it to a jury, let's put it to a jury, let's put it to a jury, let's put it to a jury", and have had your head in the sand without progressing your understanding. Now wake up and begin your journey, because only the truth (de jure authority) will set you free.
kind regards
Wolter
Re: John Wilson Is In Jail - Reply From John Wilson To Wolter J
Dear Wolter,
Trial by Jury is Democracy ....... nothing less.
Haven't you read the oh-so simple explanation of how Democracy works....unanimous judgments of Juries, etc., ???
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
Re: John Wilson Is In Jail - Reply From Wolter J to John Wilson
Sadly John, you cannot comprehend that only citizens live in democracy, which is the rule of the mob [51% control 49% and 51% are again controlled or manipulated]
Subjects live in a monarchy, where only the Monarch reigns/rules in the name of the Prime Creator [Almighty God] and yes, I shall unsubscribe to this list though I do not remember subscribing.
regards
Wolter
Re: John Wilson Is In Jail - Reply From Pierre To John Wilson
And democracy is nothing more than 3 wolves and 5 sheep deciding what's for dinner.
Therein lies your failing my friend.
Pierre
Re: John Wilson Is In Jail - Reply From John Wilson To Pierre
Dear Pierre,
That old Freemason chestnut was never taken seriously from the moment their devious little minds came up with it.
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
Re: John Wilson Is In Jail - Reply From Brian To Everyone
To all an opinion if I may.
Natural, human man (except precisely to the degree of control by intelligence), feels but does not think. He acts and reacts, automatically and instinctively, in terms of conditioning, (i.e.,of implanted suggestions or impressions), to the stimuli that arise in his physical self or environment.
That is why the great mind controllers, the great predatory interests control the avenues of publicity-TV,radio movies and all entertainment. The exploiter knows that, by bombarding our minds with suggestions, the non thinkers, can always be made to act contrary to their own interests.
Sin, hell,inflation, nationalism, patriotism, 9/11, terrorism, famine disease, fluoride, co2, energy, water, pollution, germs, bird flu; whatever, are suggestions devised to stampede the unthinking. The mass unconscious is ceaselessly deluged with fear and untruths.
Consciousness intelligently informed is man's defence against negative suggestion, or mistaken impression of any kind.
Every living person either controls or is controlled by his unconscious mind. Human, natural man cannot control himself; the Christ self is the would be controller. Intelligent, Christ- directed beings, master their unconscious; unless we do we are slaves- slaves of race; mind; of emotion; of primitive instinct and appetite; of impressions registered during this earth life; slaves of the envi