Love for Life

Accepted Draft
A draft or a bill of exchange accepted (for value) by the drawee (acceptor) by putting his/her signature and ‘accepted’ on its face.

Accepting Bank
A Bank which by signing ‘accepted’ on a time draft accepts responsibility to pay when the draft becomes due

Acceptance
A draft calling for payment at a future date which the drawee has agreed to pay by signing ‘Accepted’ on the draft. An Unconditional assent to an offer, or an assent to an offer conditioned on only minor changes that do not affect any material terms of the offer.

Please note the above are actual 'business terms' and their defintions, If you read carefully you will see that the definitions actually talk about 'Acceptance for value' by placing the word 'accepted' on the face of the demand/presentment for money. So the COLLECTING BANK must be instructed to MAKE COLLECTION on YOUR BEHALF and be given the authorization for the collection of those funds in order to ledger adjust the account reflecting a zero balance and therefore a settlement and closure of that account.

NINE TENTHS OF THE LAW – POSSESSION -As long as you are in POSESSION of the property then you have the HIGHEST CLAIM. Remember that under the Common law the party that has got possession is ‘NINE TENTHS OF THE LAW’. Now the reason that the party is in nine tenths of the law is because the party ‘In-possession’ has the ULTIMATE protection of the claim. So you can claim you are a ‘Title holder’ if you are in POSSESSION because you RETAIN the possession of the property, you PROTECT your claim on that property. So what they try to do is move into Admiralty-Maritime-Equity in order to get you off the property (or take it away from you). So if they get possession off you then presumably your claim LESSENS by the mere fact that you now don’t have possession of the property. There is such a thing as a ‘COMMON LAW LIEN’ recorded against land; well the common law lien isn’t a recording. The Common law Lien is POSSESSION. [VALUE ADDED TO PROPERTY]. As long as you can maintain POSSESSION of the property you’ve got a common law lien and your claim is PRIORITY and their claim is ‘PENDING’. – Jack Smith

Statement on www.aussiespeedingfines

July 2008 News updates

So, we put out this challenge to ANYONE – please PROVE us wrong on ANY of the following points and please explain WHY we are wrong and WHAT is your opinion of what is correct:

1. No traffic law in Australia has been correctly enacted in the Queen’s name.

2. No speed detection device being used in Australia has an NSC number which CONFIRMS that it conforms to Section 10 of the National Measurement Act 1960 (Cth).

3. The 1988 Referendum clearly decided that there was NO allowance for the establishment or continuance of local government in Australia. No local government or council has ANY right to issue ANY fines.

4. The Victorian High Court ruling Forge v ASIC clearly states that ALL courts MUST go back to operating in the manner that they did at Federation in 1900. Therefore, you have a RIGHT to request a Chapter III court hearing in accordance with this ruling.

5. Article 15 of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights states that “…. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time when the criminal offence was committed” therefore court costs cannot be added to a so-called “criminal” traffic fine.

Hi All Please read this very carefully there is an execellent spiritual knowledge contained herein. This is the understanding between the Old and New Testaments debts. This should make those testamentary documents clearer and how we should in fact be heading towards and practicing New Testament Law and not Old Testament Law like we currently are. Keep this one close to your hearts!

. Now is there any different going on IN COMMERCE that is going on in the SPIRITUAL WORLD? For instance the ‘Corporate Christian Churches’ are still operating under the Old Testament law – commercially. They have NOT come into the New Testament law whatsoever; if they did there would be NO REASON for money. The ‘Corporate Christians’ are still DEEPLY into money because they’re still trying to pay their accounts. Well paying their accounts is what the Old Testament priests did at the sacrifices.

The New Testament priests, basically the Melkezadik priests, ALREADY UNDERSTAND that the accounts have been settled but our Corporate Christian churches they’re STILL in Old Testament Law. Everybody that is operating the economy trying to write cheques as though their still the debtor, the debtor on these accounts are in Old Testament Law – NOBODY has come into Salvation – THAT’S THE PROBLEM!

Nobody understands spiritually WHAT GOD HAS BEEN TRYING TO TEACH US ALL ALONG TO COME INTO THE PROMISED LAND.’ – THE PROBLEM IS YOU ARE DYING BECAUSE YOU ARE LIVING IN THE OLD TESTAMENT AND YOU’RE STILL TRYING TO PAY THE ACCOUNT WHICH HAS BEEN PRE-PAID. The Old Testament was based on a Trust which was actually a ‘Will’ and the Trust was not put through probate until the death of the Testator – JOHN THE BAPTIST! When John died, the Old Testament ‘Will’ was probated. The New Testament is based on the NEW TESTATOR – JESUS and he died at the BEGINNING which means that the Testament was PROBATED and PRE-PAID - IT’S ALREADY DONE! That’s the difference but nobody is living their spiritual life as though the Trust was pre-paid. – So everybody is acting like lunatics.’ – Jack Smith.

Hi Folks, more great information for your learning. Copy and past below information and add to previous 'coupons' [299] emails.

INDORSEMENT - BLACKS LAW DICTIONARY, 7TH EDITION (Page 778) – The placing of a SIGNATURE sometimes with an additional notation on the back of a negotiable instrument (e.g. Money Order) to ‘transfer’ or guarantee the instrument or to ‘acknowledge’ PAYMENT. [Isn’t that why you NEED TO SIGN the BACK of the Payment slip/Coupon? – That’s the indorsement.]

SIGNING THE INSTRUMENT – Turn it over on the back, SIGN IT as ‘the agent for the drawer’. You better put the E.I.N number on there and you better put the DATE on there.

PUBLIC OPTIONS – Now if you would RATHER give up your ‘Private Coupon/Payment slip’- WHICH IS THE CREDIT you can go INTO THE BOX which is off the offer and provide a counter-offer of ‘Public Payments’ – You can become a DEBTOR and use a personal or corporate cheque, a money order, a bank cheque, Visa, MasterCard or Credit card and pay it in the ALTERNATIVE.

RESTRICTIVE INDORSMENTS – BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY, 7TH EDITION (Page 778) – An indorsement that includes a condition (e.g. ‘Pay Josefina Cardoza only if she has worked 8 full hours on April 13th’) or any other language restricting further negotiation (e.g. for deposit only’) or termed a ‘collection indorsement’

REMIT – BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY, 7TH EDITION (Page 1297)

(1) To pardon or Forgive

(3) To refer (a matter for decision) to some authority (to send back your remittance).

(5) To Transmit (as money) < Upon receiving the DEMAND LETTER, she promptly remitted the amount due.

So one of the definitions is ‘to transmit AS MONEY’ your payment slip. So that would be YOUR REMITTANCE COUPON. You TRANSMIT the coupon/Payment Slip AS MONEY! - JACK SMITH

Our Conclusion is that 'PERSON' and 'INDIVIDUAL' are terms referring to LEGAL FICTIONS, or a strawman. Both of these words are also said to be 'NATURAL-PERSONS' and as such are 'Members of the body Politic' owing allegiance to the state.

These entities are created by the state (Through the Birth Certificate) in and exist in the civil society that we call 'THE PUBLIC'. As such they are 'SUBJECT'(Slaves) to the rules established by their creators, the civil government.

Men, on the other hand are OUTSIDE of 'THE PUBLIC'. You might think of 'THE PUBLIC' as if it were a 'BOX' that contains ONLY LEGAL FICTIONS and men live outside of this box.

‘The issue is that CRIMINAL takes over when the CIVIL didn’t resolve the matter. If you can use as a demure (A different issue of law) you see the criminal is the government that comes onto an issue after some third party presumably has been damaged and then the govt just adds a criminal case. Well the ONLY way that you could SUBSTANTIVELY CAUSE the criminal case to go away is to CORRECT THE CIVIL LIABILITY which created the dishonour which gave rise to the criminal case.

So you have to DISPOSE of the substance of the civil infraction and correct that by way of SETOFF RESTITUTION, whatever it is then you have come back and accept the criminal filing because the criminal filing procedurally was there to make the government revenue, that’s why they pass all these statutes is TO MAKE REVENUE to SUSTAIN the democratic occupation army to protect the people in the land themselves and the only way the army gains REVENUE in order to stay on the land to protect the people through their money source, which is the ‘Kings court’.

So AFTER you resolve the civil issue, you’ve got to accept the criminal charges and you’ve got to be wiling to PAY the criminal proceeding – A SETOFF – on the private account in order to give restitution to the government so that they can SETTLE UP & CLOSE the criminal case. So first you have to SETOFF THE CIVIL, which gets rid of the substance behind the reason that the criminal (action) is there then you have to OFFER THE COURT the SETOFF for the ‘Monetary Charges’ so that they government can build up their coffer to maintain the army to keep us under protection to cause the criminal case to go into the background. So you do both of those things and it should go away!’ – Jack Smith &&

‘UNDERSTAND this, that under CONTRACT LAW if an offer is made and the other party puts in a COUNTER-OFFER which RESOLVES the matter in another manner but nevertheless resolves the same matter then its deemed under contract law that the original offer is no longer binding and is WITHDRAWN from the proceeding and the counter-offer IS ON THE TABLE.

So remember just like in any MOTIONS or PLEADINGS is LAST IN – FIRST OUT! You have to have the last motion on the table otherwise you’re in deep doo doo because all these courts of ADMIRALTY MARITIME are courts of NON-RECORD because they HAVE NO HISTORY mentally of the whole proceedings and findings.

All they do is GO TO THE TOP DOCUMENT and they’re doing whatever is on the top document. It’s a court of NON-RECORD because THE RECORD IS WHAT’S ON TOP. So if the other party puts in a motion, you better not just object to the motion, you had better not write a document IN OPPOSITION to the motion because if you’re on their motion, on their premise under public policy then you’re screwed. You’ve got to REPLACE what they’re asking for with YOUR MOTION from the private side FOR REMEDY so that when you’re in those proceedings you’re dealing with the motion that’s on top of their motion.’ – Jack Smith

HI - This below is an excellent way to understand andy presentment that comes your way, be it a fine, summons, order, any legal commercial presentment then the information below applies. Please read and memorize this. Paste into your notes for future reference. Alex, please read below - and keep in your notes. Good basic understanding here.

‘Whatever document COMES TO YOU, if it is a letter, a Motion, summons whatever, you would write across it ACCEPTED FOR VALUE – RETURNED FOR VALUE FOR SETTLEMENT & CLOSURE on proof of claim that the process that has extended so far has not settled and closed this IN FAVOUR of ‘Your client’.

You see when they send you a letter; the game is like ‘HOT POTATO’. Whatever document/letter you get, whoever HOLDS the paper is responsible/liable on that process. The idea in ‘HOT POTATO’ is that the one stuck with the potato at the end IS IN TROUBLE. You DON’T want to hold the paper because if you HOLD THE PAPER you HOLD THE DUTY to respond and make the claim right.

You see an ‘OFFER’ in contract is the one party giving you an opportunity to achieve or do something. What they are trying to do is to SOLICIT you to change from the ‘winning mode’ as a creditor into the accepted mode of being the debtor. They made you an offer by sending you the paper.

In contract law, sometimes the FAILURE TO RESPOND TIMELY IS AN ACCEPTANCE OF THAT OFFER – BY DISHONOUR. So if you hold the paper, he’s CHARGING you with being a DEBTOR. By charging he is saying, ‘I want you to voluntarily accept this role’. If you keep this paper then you have ACCEPTED THE OFFER and you have got to comply with it. If you reject the offer that’s like a dishonour so the ONLY thing that you could do is a COUNTER-OFFER. Now under Contract law it says once a party COUNTEROFFERS the original offer is REMOVED from the table. If you ‘Accept for Value’ the offer - NOT that you AGREE with it but you are ACCEPTING THE PAPERWORK OFFER but you are RETURNING IT WITH MY COUNTEROFFER WITH NEW CONDITIONS. Now because you have ‘Accepted the offer’ and counter offered, the terms of the original offer NO LONGER APPLY The terms of the counteroffer apply.– That’s contract law. – Jack Smith.

YOU DON’T FILE THE ACTUAL INSTRUMENT – You file a NOTICE of the instrument which is why you’re doing it on a UCC-1- WITHOUT AN EXHIBIT and if you do it properly on a UCC-1, with the Secretary of State in your state and you do it appropriately he’s going to TRANSFER the notice of it down to your county and its going to be a notice of the lien filed – NOT the actual instrument, which would CONVEY all your rights right back to the state again because if you give a NOTICE OF LIEN aren’t you keeping the Lien PRIVATE? - Yes which means that the Lien is ‘In-chambers’ isn’t it. If the Lien is ‘In-chambers’ your LIEN IS PROTECTED, now would you ever need to bring the Lien to the chambers to the judge if necessary but you probably don’t even have to do that. You just need to bring PUBLIC NOTICE of the ‘NOTICE OF THE LIEN’ and if nobody ever rebuts or disputes the actual Lien itself that document NEVER has to appear but if it has to appear it can appear ‘In-Chambers’ to protect your rights.’ – Jack Smith &&&

‘You can give up your UNALIENABLE RIGHTS by either succumbing to the public procedure or you can WAIVE it and give it up by NOT talking about YOUR ISSUE in the merits and turn the conversation back to THEIR ISSUES on the merits. Now when it comes to the merits of the public issue, the merits evidence has to go into the private side ‘In-Chambers’, you can never bring any evidence to the merits of the issue in public OR you have re-conveyed the substance of your claim to the public again. So ALWAYS TALK ABOUT YOUR ISSUE IN QUESTION FORM. NEVER talk about their issue in statement or question form. ALWAYS SUBMIT your record to the PRIVATE HEARINGS OFFICER ‘In-chambers’ and NEVER into a public procedure, never filed with the clerk of court on a public time stamp. When it comes to procedure they’re basically going to try to get you to give honour to the general jurisdiction of the court under PUBLIC POLICY without qualifying your actions to protect your rights and they’re going to try to get you ACCEPT A PUBLIC BENEFIT, which would come under either their insurance policy for public protection, submit yourself to their statues and jurisdiction, ACCEPT THE BENEFIT of a public attorney/lawyer, accept the benefit of liability funding for settling the account or for setting up the bonds and if you do any of those things you’ve just WAIVED YOUR UNALIENABLE RIGHTS to your claim in which case the judge will ignore everything you’ve done both in your procedure and in your record and you will be found LIABLE under public policy in whatever the MERITS of the public claim are whether they have any value or reality to them or not. So you’ve got to understand these procedures.’

PAGANISM is someone who hides behind 'PERCEIVED AUTHORITY' in order to Steal and that is EXACTLY what a man does WHEN HE HAS A 'TRUST'.

He is HIDING behind the Trust. He is saying that the Trust owns his property when the TRUST IS ARTIFICIAL. If the Trust is artificial - IT DOESN'T EXIST! if it doens't exist- guess what? it CAN'T own anything.' - Lazslo Horvath

Hi All - This one below I believe is very critical. Please keep this information below, safe where you know it will be. Especially with anyone who wants to correct the Legal Title position of the children and take away the legal title from the state. It also explains what needs to be done to bring forward your claim, this procedure is used in any commercial or legal matter, regardless as they all deal with 'claims' and 'Counterclaims'. Now you know why the state makes you 'Register' your children - so they can have legal control over them. Also pass this one on to those that are seeking the truth.
.
‘Children are NOT born with ‘Applications’ for Birth Certificates. Had there been an application for a Birth Certificate then that is ‘Turned over to the State’, the state would have PRIMA FACIA LEGAL TITLE TO THE CHILDREN and the parents have nothing but a ‘User’ equitable claim for possession as long as they obeyed every rule, Order and every issue of the Corporate State. The application for the Birth Certificate qualifies as BONA FIDE EVIDENCE which is introduced into the court institution and by those records, properly handled, parents MUST SHOW ‘PRIVATE TITLE CLAIM’ to the children in terms of Legal Title and brought a COUNTERCLAIM. None of the parents UNDERSTAND or are capable of understanding what is BEING DONE HERE so the state then can ‘issue orders’ to take ‘Legal Custody and Control’ of the children under ONE – VERY – SIMPLE- provision of law – TITLES TO THE CHILDREN HAVE BEEN TO APPEARED TO BE ABANDONED and because no-one makes a claim for the Title to the children under the ‘RULE OF LAW’ (Presumptions), the state escheats all abandoned property and Titles which give the state PURE AUTHORITY to gather under its wings the children, to be ‘protected’ under the state because they are legally abandoned by the parents when NO CLAIM IS MADE’ So what we’re seeing here under your PROOF OF CLAIM is if you can’t show a document of ‘LEGAL TITLE’ you have ‘No Substance’, you have ‘No Standing’ in any hearing in any tribunal and you will not prevail –To do what is right- not only do you have to pay your debts but to do what is right if you are going to prevail YOU HAVE GOT TO MAKE A CLAIM IN THEIR SYSTEM otherwise the ‘Failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted’ applies and means that you have NO CLAIM and NO STANDING. The court or Tribunal will NOT listen or look at anything you do.

So what is a claim? A claim is EVIDENCE of Legal Title. In order to have Legal Title and if the property in question (Your children) is involved in some kind of a Trust proceedings and some document Memorializing that document exists (The Birth Certificate) and if that original Document Memorializing that Trust is RECORDED/REGISTERED in the public, the public has the legal Title claim. In order for you TO ASSERT A CLAIM on that property you have to do something to REMOVE that document of Title from the public registry and replacing that with a ‘Notice of Claim’ Against the same property based on the fact that you can now show that you have INVERTED that Trust and taken the Trustee position away from the ‘Public Government’ and you RE-ASSUME the position of PRIVATE TRUSTEE over the property (Children) assuming legal Title. Jack Smith

JUDICIAL DISTRICTS – THE GREAT SEAL
Laszlo Horvath

· UCC-1 is a FUTURE PERFORMANCE LIEN that’s all it is. So you use a UCC-1 Lien you just gave yourself something to do that was impossible for you to accomplish because you can’t magically transform them into a Lien and get money for it – that’s magic. When you’re dealing in magic you’re dealing in PAGANISM. What this translates to in court is that EQUITY IS CREATED WHERE EQUITY DOES NOT EXIST.

· In EQUITY it translates to STEALING. If you take away the uniform you take away the badge then all it is, is somebody coming up to you with a gun and saying you owe me. It’s called HIGHWAY ROBBERY, there’s a man in a uniform, HIDING behind the uniform. It’s saying that that uniform has authority – that’s paganism. It’s saying because he’s wearing that uniform, it’s ok for him to steal so therefore it OVERRIDES the Ten Commandments and therefore if he overrides the Ten Commandments he’s saying that he’s a god over and above the Ten Commandments therefore he is a god over and above Yahweh – that’s paganism.

· PAGANISM is a THIEF who hides behind ‘Perceived Authority’ in order to steal’ and that is exactly what a man does when he has a Trust. He is hiding behind the Trust. He is saying that the Trust owns his property when the Trust is ARTIFICIAL. If the Trust is artificial it doesn’t exist. If it doesn’t exist – GUESS WHAT – it can’t own anything.

· Here’s the REALITY OF A TRUST. When you record a Trust in the country Recorder (Council) it falls under what is called a ‘Great Seal’. All of the City Seals are under the State Seals and all of the State Seals are under the Presidents seals – one great seal, that’s it. You just gave ALL of your property over to the president.

· There are only two Statuses in this country – SOVEREIGN or SLAVE. The Sovereign has a great Seal, the Slaves DO NOT.

· The only thing that has to do with PRIVATE RIGHTS – ‘In-Law’ is a GREAT SEAL. There is nothing else on earth that deals with Private Rights and that is because IF YOU HAVE A RIGHT YOU DON’T HAVE A PRIVILEGE ( Benefit), IF YOU HAVE A PRIVILEGE (Benefit) ,YOU DON’T HAVE A RIGHT.

· People have a GREAT RESPECT for the law and they thought it is the law. They started using these ‘CATCH PHRASES’ like ‘You need to pay your fair share’ or ‘this is a tax obligation’ and people started falling for these – IT’S A SCAM. Uniform citations are a scam.

· DRIVER LICENCES have ALL FICTIONAL INFORMATION on it – it doesn’t exist. So let’s get back to equity here. You paid for the roads with your ‘taxes’ but it is a PRIVILEGE to travel on them. So if you’re ‘PAYING’ for them, how is it a privilege to travel on them? It’s all nothing but a scam. It’s not a contract; they put it in your mind that it’s a contract, that’s what the thieves do, they’re very cunning and very good at what they do.

· They are now NOT allowing the Ten Commandments in the Court. It TELLS YOU that your ‘Judicial Districts’ have been INFILTRATED and have been changed over to BLACK MARKET COURTS. You EITHER have LAW or No LAW. Your District Court is your ‘Judicial District of 50’ under Exodus Chapter 18

· This GETTING OUT OF THE SYSTEM is nothing but an acknowledgement – that’s all it is. You’re just acknowledging what the TRUTH is. This is NOT a choice. People are misinterpreting CHOICE, this is NOT a ‘Choice’ – you’re just acknowledging WHAT IS – that’s all you’re doing.
THE TRUTH IS – THIS IS YAHWEH’S FOOTSTOOL – HE OWNS IT, NOBODY ELSE! – Laszlo Horvath – Judicial Districts & the Great Seal

‘Everything in society is DYSFUNCTIONAL on the public side and the reason that its dysfunctional is because its all BACKWARDS because what they’re trying to do is that they’re trying to CONVINCE CREDITORS that they’re DEBTORS so that they can CONTINUE TO STEAL from the creditors and get something for nothing. [Its’ all backwards THE TAIL WAGS THE DOG]

‘You may be able to use the BANKRUPTCY so you cannot be held liable for your debt and never be in debt. In the ORIGINAL LANGUAGE the words ‘DEBT’ and ‘SIN’ are the SAME WORDS.

We have commerce and we call it DEBT. In a ‘spiritual’ (theology) sense we call it SIN. We get into the Bible and we find out that we are REDEEMED from SIN, we have our salvation we have our REMEDY and in commerce we have the same thing, WE HAVE A REMEDY and the remedy is BANKRUPTCY. You do not have to go to Bankruptcy court to USE bankruptcy – we use it EVERYDAY! We use it with Federal Reserve Bank Notes. It is based upon A PROMISE, therefore a promise is payment (Tender of consideration more precisely) and a promissory note is a GOOD AS CASH.’ The reason that the TREASURY owes you and is OBLIGATED to pay the bill for you is because they took everything of substance (Legal Titles because there’s no Gold) they took the Gold and they took the silver, they took Title to your Land and Title to your car and your Birth Certificate is Titled to your LABOUR for your Lifetime. – Jack Smith

‘What BOOKS & RECORDS you produce is voluntary depending on ‘Who the hell you think you are’. Are you a CREDITOR or a Debtor? God says in Scripture, if you want to be a SLAVE - BE A GOOD SLAVE, file your tax returns and pay the public what YOU owe AS A DEBTOR/SLAVE. If you want to be a good Sovereign file the CORRECT forms and show how you contributed to this great Nation by ‘Extending your credit’ and you deserve the have the returns as a creditor. All they will do is process your paperwork based on who you said you are to them by who you perceive yourself to be. If you’re a creditor, the (Tax) Return goes to the Creditor (Original Issue Discount – OID). If you’re a debtor they’re going to take something away from you so that they can pay the party that ACTS LIKE THE CREDITOR which is the Corporation because YOU didn’t correct the Books & Records. So how are they violating anybodies rights? You violated YOUR OWN rights when you FAILED TO UNDERSTAND who you were and file the correct documents – Make Sense? – Jack Smith &&&

[This quote is in relation to filing your tax returns either as the debtor/slave or the creditor] - Remember everything is already pre-paid so when you use legal tender, that is now a second time you have paid when you already have extended credit initially. We tend to fill out the tax return as debtors instead of creditors.The purpose of doing a tax return is to RETURN a 'RE-FUND' to the original creditor. When you don't do this you are abandoning your claim. That is why when you get a 'receipt' is says 'Tax Invoice' on the receipt - Yes? You therefore have the option by filing the correct forms either monthly or quarterely to the tax dept (ATO) to now claim back those funds, as a creditor by filing the correct paperwork because you credit ALREADY paid for those items - Do you understand this?

HOW DO YOU PAY – The Judge will say, ‘You can pay with whatever you normally pay with’. Ok does EVERYBODY understand that? You can pay with WHATEVER you normally use to pay your bills with. What do you normally use to pay your bills with? - YOUR SIGNATURE! Doesn’t the assumption of all money START with your promise to pay? ‘Well your honour, what I normally use is MY SIGNATURE on a ‘bill of exchange’. Can I make one out for you right now? Ok now when you make that instrument it’s going to be either a three party instrument or a two party instrument. If it’s a two party instrument – it’s a promise.

If it’s a three-party instrument it’s a ‘Money Order’ but if it’s a three party instrument the third party has to be a banker with an account which should be the Secretary of Treasury UNDER the Social Security account number. Whoever has Legal Title over that account can tell the banker/the fiduciary, the Secretary of Treasury to DISPERSE the funds. If you have NOT INVERTED the Trust and taken back legal Title of that account, you can’t direct the Secretary of Treasury to disperse the accounting units out of that fund. What you ordinarily use is the ‘Money Order’ – Promise to pay!’ So in any way shape and form what you use to pay your bills comes out of that account by way of YOUR SIGNATURE or YOUR DISHONOUR with respect to not giving your signature. So all you have to do is write out the money order and SETTLE and CLOSE the account’ – Jack Smith.

MURDER – Now we’re talking Murder and manslaughter in DISNEYLAND – not in REALITY. It was a pile of papers that were killed, somewhere! In the real world you won’t bring the man back to life, ‘they’ see an INVESTMENT and a SECURITY to which there is NO LONGER any collateral so they have (now) got a COMMERCIAL LOSS otherwise the books don’t balance but if we throw you in jail and can (then) SELL your prison time for ‘X’ number of dollars to balance the books – that’ll work! – ALL CRIMES ARE COMMERCIAL’.

We can’t have REALITY interfering with ‘Our World’; we want those ‘Elephants to Fly’ because it makes us big profits. If you tell us that those elephants can’t fly, then YOU’RE the dysfunctional party in Disneyland – Jack Smith &&

‘ALL FICTION has to do with ‘law courts’, LAWYERS, your government’s part in war, law enforcement agencies and armies are ALL FICTIONS, they’re all propaganda. Propaganda wrapped up with a human interest story of a hero or heroine to HOOK the public into it and give you a FALSE IMPRESSION of what that particular agency or outfit is all about and it works SO WELL. Most Police are NOT bringing in a Murderer; they are out bringing in MONEY and keeping their ears open for all kinds of gossip. NOTHING is EVER what it seems’ – Alan Watt – Cutting through the Matrix.
NOTHING IS LEFT TO CHANCE

‘If the strawman signs it (Mortgage Deed/Warranty Deed) then the county (council) has legal Title. In WHAT CAPACITY is the strawman signing the documents? As a PUBLIC TRUSTEE! Because the property is in PUBLIC and where ever the CIDEST of the property is, is where the CIDEST OF THE TRUST is but there is another provision in Trusts. Where ever the RESIDENTS of the majority of the Trustees are is the resident of the Trust. So if you have NOT reclaimed the strawman by way of the Birth Certificate – Acceptance and Return – What is the residence of the strawman? He’s in the PUBLIC STATE! So where does the Title to the property stand? In the Public State! So whether the living man or the strawman signs the documents, if the Title of the property IS IN THE STATE, it all deals with the state as CREDITOR regardless of who the hell you say you are.

Now if you do the REDEMPTION FOR THE STRAWMAN what you’re really saying now is that he just PULLED the Trust from the PUBLIC because he used to reside down there when the Trust documents are in the Public but now we have INVERTED them and taken them into the PRIVATE then the strawman Trustee now resides in the private. If the Title to the property is now in the private and he signs his name as STRAWMAN – COMMA, Private Trustee, did the strawman now convey any Titles to the legal public? Not unless he re-grants. It’s not in the name, it’s not even in the fact that he’s a Trustee, if he is the Trustee in the PRIVATE TRUST and the property is in the private Trust and he doesn’t re-grant it, he now has CONTROL & AUTHORITY as the strawman Trustee in the private Trust so it FOLLOWS the Title to the property but the property can go back and forth depending on the idiocy of the Trustee who’s ‘Controlling’ it because he can re-grant it back in a heartbeat if he isn’t clever and knowledgeable about what he’s doing.' - Jack Smith

‘The Notary Public has the RECORDS which SUPPORTS the claim but once you get the CERTIFICATE (of Protest) you can OPERATE on that certificate and the operator has the ability to go out and then BRING PLEADINGS. If we (the people) get a COMMERCIAL CLAIM in our favour, aren’t we the BENEFICIARY of that claim. If the Notary Public issues a certificate are we the BENEFICIAL INTERESTED PARTY of the CLAIM of that certificate? You Bet! Who is it that brings ‘suits’ in court? A disgruntled beneficiary against a BAD-ASS TRUSTEE.

If you got a CERTIFICATE OF PROTEST in your favour – YOU’RE A BENEFICIARY! As a Beneficiary, can’t you go in by a PETITION or a PLEADING even in the public court against the Public Trustees who are not granting the claim that’s in the Certificate? In other words you have REVERSED on them for execution and you are a Public Beneficiary for ‘we the people’ and can make a CLAIM for benefits by getting the public Trustees to CORRECT their record.

IF YOU DON’T PLAY THE ROLE OF SOME ENTITY IN THEIR PUBLIC TRUST, HOW CAN THEIR PUBLIC TRUST GIVE YOU A REMEDY?

IF ASKED TO FILE A MOTION – Response – “If I file a motion am I NOT asking for a Public Benefit which would then RE-GRANT my PRIVATE Unalienable rights back to the court without adequate compensation? – Now under the constitution and the Bill of rights what do ‘we the people’ have a right to? PETITION THE GOVT FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCE.

And now you would have to put in a PETITION and (Agree to act the role) of an ‘Aggrieved Party’ in the Public Trust who has a CLAIM for a ‘REDRESS OF GRIEVANCE’ against the Public Trustees which have failed to address the Private record for SETTLEMENT & CLOSURE.

‘You see EVERYBODY has an UNALIENABLE RIGHT to petition the government if you have a PRIVATE CLAIM and NOT a PUBLIC GRIEVANCE. And remember that a claims means that you have TITLE otherwise you are just two equitable parties FIGHTING OVER THE CRUMBS which is what most cases are in their courts’

'WHAT'S GOING ON' -
Ok, if you look in the dictionary it talks in a form of definition like the court is the regal retinue of a sovereign. What the hell does that mean? I don’t know but if you talk to the Patriots do they want to claim to be sovereign? In this country did the Supreme Court say the Sovereign powers, not the Sovereign itself but the Sovereign powers RESIDE IN THE PEOPLE not in a King or the government.

So each and every living man and woman and child when he becomes of age is looked upon as HAVING Sovereign powers so any POLITICAL or COMMERCIAL problems that reach to you as a living man or woman, aren’t YOU the court with regard to YOUR problems? So YOU are ‘The Court’ in ‘THE WORLD’ – IF you accept responsibility for your acts and actions. &&& 72

Now if you don’t accept responsibility for your actions, you’re INCOMPETENT and you’re NOT ‘The Court’. You’re just a party and someone is appointed to take your position to resolve your issues as a Fiduciary. The Fiduciary has LEGAL POWER for your acts and actions thereby he is YOUR CREDITOR and you’re the debtor because you’re not accepting responsibility – YOU ARE THE ‘OWNER’ of the problem, the Debtor and your Fiduciary is the Creditor of the problem. He’s the guy that’s responsible to SETTLE your problems.

READ THIS ONE CAREFULLY SO THAT YOU DO UNDERSTAND THIS.
‘The Banks record ALL of their (Title) documents with the county (Council/Shire). The county is the LEGAL TITLE HOLDER and it’s the Trustee OVER the claims of the Bank and when the Bank FILES their ORIGINAL documents – THE MORTGAGE DEED or TRUST DEED, actually the county (Council/Shire) has LEGAL TITLE over their claim since you, the HOMEOWNER ALLOWED THE FILING of YOUR original WARRANTY DEED, the county (Council or Shire) has LEGAL TITLE over your ownership and your property.

All you have is an ‘EQUITABLE INTEREST’, all the bank has is an ‘Equitable Interest’, the County (Council/shire) is the ONLY party in the suit that has a legal Title or a LEGAL CLAIM and remember in order for you to HAVE A CLAIM you MUST HAVE Legal Title of some kind.’ – Jack Smith &&&

WHAT ARE TAXES? Taxes are a PRIORITY LIEN and ALL liens in ADMIRALTY are ‘SECRET LIENS’ or else they’re PUBLIC.

So when the attorney for the County (Council-Shire) says, ‘Our Lien is priority’ – what is he really saying? He’s really saying ‘We’re the Legal Title holder and taxes (Council Rates) are a priority Lien because we are Title holders and the legal Title holder is the Creditor’.

So first he’s saying ‘We are a creditor with a priority lien’. Why didn’t he bring any evidence of his lien attached to his pleading? Because evidence of his Lien is ALREADY in the judge’s chambers, NOTICE WHAT IS GOING ON HERE? For instance the county (Council-Shire) is the Trustee and the Trustee can LIEN the property with anyone he wants to lien the property with. Is the county going to TELL YOU who those Lien holders are? Not at all because if they divulge their Lien then they would be giving their rights BACK to the county, into the public instead of keeping it private.

So in order to protect their PRIVATE RIGHTS they did NOT attach evidence of their Lien to their pleading but the pleading will go nowhere unless the judge does not have NOTICE of the Lien which is in private in-chambers just like ours (Certificate of Protest = Claim= Legal Title = makes you the Lien holder= you must keep this in private also) SO GET THE PICTURE. If you think that when you CONVEY to the judge – IN PRIVATE, the evidence of your Lien, you’re the only one doing that! The county’s lien are private i.e. not available to the public and the REASON the court ALWAYS GRANTS the foreclosure is because the one that’s REALLY MOVING THE COURT is the county because they have the priority lien. So if you’re going to SETOFF the Bank for the MORTGAGE you’re going to get nowhere unless you have also taken Legal Title AWAY FROM THE COUNTY (Council/Shire) and setoff the county’s Secret liens by way of a SETOFF INSTRUMENT (negotiable Instrument) also otherwise you’re not the priority lien holder at the Public hearing’

Let me ask you a question, if you’ve completed your process do you believe that YOU have a PRIORITY CLAIM? (Yes) Ok then if you do not make that PLEADING known to the Public Side of the court, how can they sit back and say, ‘Tell us about it’ because you HAVE NOT ENERGIZED them to hear it. You can DIRECT the court to your ISSUE all you want but UNLESS there is a PLEADING on the PUBLIC SIDE in that court allowing that court jurisdiction to ‘entertain’ that issue, that judge is going to ignore you, rule against you or give you a bad answer, because the COURTS JURISDICTION was not INVOKED as to that matter.

So we’re walking a line here between the SUBSTANCE of our evidence, which we DON’T want to put into the public but we have to put in a PLEADING to request the FORM of the hearing. So remember if you’re the CREDITOR which is what you have got to be, and then ultimately it is UP TO YOU to deal with the substance and also the form.’

Is any decision of the Jury RELEVANT to any matters that are going on in the court? It’s NOT RELEVANT AT ALL; it’s all IN THE BOX. Where does the WITNESS TESTIFY? – IN A BOX! Is there any statement or of truth or lie or any testimony of the witness that’s relevant to the proceedings. We don’t’ care if he lies, tells the truth or anything else and it has NO decision on the judgement. Where does the judge sit? On a raised platform BOX, is the judge in the court? No!

Who’s in the court? – THE PLAINTIFF, THE DEFENDANT and their two agents. Isn’t that an awful lot like the old fashion duels where you have the two principals and their alternates? The ONLY ones in the court are the parties. The reason the defendant always loses has NOTHING to do with the Jury because the Judge is going to tell them what to do.

It has NOTHING to do with the judge, he’s not the opponent. It has EVERYTHING to do with the parties settling the matter. Obviously the party didn’t settle the matter before it went into the public didn’t he because they’re there under DISPUTE. So who’s going to lose? The DEFENDANT, we don’t even know what the case is about, we don’t even know what the facts are – It doesn’t matter - ITS ALL ON THE MOON, We’re in DISNEYLAND.

Let’s talk about the Trial. We understand, by way of communication there are rules of structure in English. If there is something on a paper that is ENCLOSED IN A BOX, what is it’s relevance to the material in the document? What is the RULE OF CONSTRUCTION, what is the relevance for WHAT’S IN THE BOX to the contents of the document? Scott shine clear please!

SCOTT The rule of thumb usually says that anything inside a box on a document is OUTSIDE of the document itself.

JACK It’s NOT there! It’s ONLY there for reference. It is NOT part of the contents (of the document).

SCOTT I just signed a contract back in December and inside there was a box that Jack’s talking about and in that box it said that I would agree to all the terms on the back of the page. So I etched out the back of the page and I crossed out the box but also on the front of the page but everything on the front of the page I agreed to. So be real careful when you sign these contracts.

JACK Look at a courtroom, is the court room a box? Something is going on IN THE BOX right? So basically it’s probably WHAT’S IN THE BOX that is relevant to everything else in the box right? The courtroom is divided into TWO BOXES, there’s a BAR.

So there’s the box OUTSIDE the BAR and box INSIDE the BAR. Is anything that goes on outside the box RELEVANT to the proceedings INSIDE the BAR? – NO! Inside the BAR, where does the jury sit? In the Box? Is the jury in the court? – ITS NOT THERE!

Going into their court requires A CLAIM. FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM IS FATAL. So now the question now comes up, what is a claim? A claim is LEGAL TITLE to the property that is involved in the dispute. Does the strawman have a claim? By definition the strawman has NO legal Title, a strawman has NO claim. A Strawman cannot win because having FAILED to bring a claim (Legal Title) there is NO SETOFF against the presumed Legal Title claim of the plaintiff or the prosecution therefore a ‘Defendant/Strawman’ can NEVER win because he can NEVER present a Legal Title and never present a claim which makes sense.

When you can finally figure out, WHAT IS HAPPENING HERE then you can go back to the gurus who are presenting the paperwork and figure out whether the paperwork is STYLED correctly for a creditor. Then you have got to say, what is the procedure to get this resolved knowing that FIRST I must settle it ON THE PRIVATE SIDE.

What happens when an attorney is appointed for the strawman? The strawman is incompetent; he is the OWNER of the problem. The attorney is the Trustee/Fiduciary creditor with LEGAL TITLE to the problem but shares no responsibility for sharing the judgement which falls on the owner of the problem, which is the strawman. If you PLAY THE ROLE of strawman in a court you are an OWNER-OPERATOR.

If you ATTACH yourself to his arguments, you are a PARTNER of the OWNER – OPERATOR. You are also, by voluntary consent a DEBTOR. If you choose to RESOLVE the issues that are affecting the living man or woman in the private sector you are the CREDITOR COURT as long as you accept the responsibility to resolve the issue. If you EVADE the responsibility of settling the issue – you are a DEBTOR!

What we’re saying here is that PUBLIC NOTARIES have a COMMISSION so that the PRIVATE living people in the Republic can go to them with the evidence. They can take that evidence and put it UNDER SEAL and this is what ‘this statute’ had done by congress in 1850 because they knew what they were going to do to the private citizens and they still had to give them the ability for a procedural remedy that could be TRANSFERRED TO THE PUBLIC SECTOR COURTS without the private people GRANTING PERSONAM JURISDICTION to come in and argue in the Public courts.

They can bring their evidence through a JUSTICE OF THE PEACE under the ‘Justice’s of the peace’ seal but they knew that in FORM they were going to destroy the Justices of the peace because they would only operate if the public was operating in a RE- public but it’s not anymore.

So they’re going to destroy the offices of the ‘Justice of the peace’ but THEY HAD TO GIVE THE PEOPLE A REMEDY and they established the Justices of the peace power in the Notaries.

This below is the REAL reason why you pay 'Council Rates'.
It is interesting what we’re seeing in the world in regard to TITLES TO PROPERTY. The King started the ‘Rule against Perpetuity’ to the doctrine of what was called the ‘Mortmain Acts.’

What they did is they prohibited Ecclesiastical corporations (Church Properties) from owning or holding property in perpetuity, perpetuity means without end.

That means that they (people) could not own or hold property INDEFINITELY. Under God’s law, property Titles would STAY WITHIN THE FAMILY in perpetuity. It would go from the father, to the first son, to the first son, not just for the use of the male heirs but because they were the TRUSTEES for the family. So it would stay in the family UNDER the first male heir IN- PERPETUTITY.

Why would the Crown NOT LIKE THAT? They couldn’t tax them because if it NEVER changed hands, it NEVER entered COMMERCE. If it never entered commerce it could never be taxed and CONTROLLED by the King. If they didn’t’ sell and buy TITLES OF LAND today and Banks didn’t put Mortgages (Dead Pledge) on them. They didn’t get recorded in County Recorder’s offices then they would basically be ALLODIAL (Free hold) outside the scope of the commercial system and any form of taxation. So the King does not like Titles of Land NOT changing often.’

The PURPOSE of the LETTER ROGATORY is to ENQUIRE of the second court ('This court') whether they will hold some evidentiary hearings to help resolve matters that are of issue in both jurisdictional venues.

The Notary is going to appear through its seal on its record and what is the authority and the power of that document?’ It has the same powers as the Justice of the peace. Were justices of the peace court officials? You better believe it so it’s ONE COURT reporting to ANOTHER COURT.

Well didn’t the Notary Public GATHER the evidence in ‘THE COURT’?’(In the PRIVATE VENUE) And is it now conveying evidence in ‘THE COURT’ -Private venue TO ‘THIS COURT’- Public Policy Foreign court, and saying to the people in ‘THIS COURT’, ‘I have no authority to tell you what to do but you see reciprocity requires that you HONOUR what we do if you want me to HONOUR what you do and consequently this is the way that people have sworn to and delivered the evidence to us. We did our job over here by investigation. We’re conveying this to you people and if you create an investigation and find out that any of this is not correct, please report back to us so that we can adjust our records.

The only question is did the substance of your investigation and evidence that you brought forward rebut any of the issues set-forth in our/my Notarial process?

This is a TWO-WAY street; it’s not a shove it down their throat type of thing. So if the judge made THAT RULING then he has seen something WRONG in your process that you didn’t see. STOP getting on your high horse ASSUMING that everytime a magistrate rules against you that it was THERE screw-up and not that they’re trying to teach you, what it is to PERFECT your process even more. So DON’T take these criticisms as being a personal attack on you or don’t take the criticisms necessarily as meaning that everything that you’ve done is wrong. Most of it is probably right and they’re trying to TELL YOU COLOURABLY what it is that you did do wrong that you need to correct to get it done right ’ – Jack Smith &&&

RERUM NOVARUM (1891)

1. Just type in " RERUM NOVARUM PDF " in your google or yahoo or whatever search engine
and download the Vatican/Catholic church document titled "RERUM NOVARUM" which
promotes the abolition of private property rights as early as 1891.

"The whore that rides the beast" set up the Federal Reserve/Reserve Bank systems and controls all of the incorporated churches also. I am somewhat surprised this document took so long to be mentioned or surface.

Now just because the judge & the court in jurisdiction B (Fiction Land) issues a judgement and if you’re smart enough, you got a RULING out of the Notary Public by way of a CERTIFICATE OF PROTEST which is the RECORD from jurisdiction A (Land of Reality) and you put it into jurisdiction B for REVIEW and for AUDIT and for CORRECTION and that’s what the judge (may do) by giving HIS RULING from jurisdiction B. so you have got a RULING from jurisdiction A, you got a RULING from jurisdiction B, now if for some reason you look at his ruling in jurisdiction B and you come back and CORRECT what ever jurisdiction B told you was wrong, get more evidence of a correction and then RE-SUBMIT it to jurisdiction B you’re right back in the negotiations again.

This is a TWO-WAY street; it’s not a shove it down their throat type of thing. So if the judge made THAT RULING then he has seen something WRONG in your process that you didn’t see. STOP getting on your high horse ASSUMING that everytime a magistrate rules against you that it was THERE screw-up and not that they’re trying to teach you, what it is to PERFECT your process even more. So DON’T take these criticisms as being a personal attack on you or don’t take the criticisms necessarily as meaning that everything that you’ve done is wrong. Most of it is probably right and they’re trying to TELL YOU COLOURABLY what it is that you did do wrong that you need to correct to get it done right ’ – Jack Smith &&&

‘Only PARTIES or attorneys/lawyers can ‘FILE’ a motion and if you ‘FILE’ a motion, don’t you have to be one of the ‘Public Parties’ (Fictions)? But then if you ‘FILE’ a motion with the court, aren’t you SEEKING A BENEFIT? – YES! If you’re seeking a benefit then are you subject to the jurisdiction of the court – YES! And now you have just jumped ‘down’ and become a Public Trustee instead of a Private Trustee.’ – Jack Smith &&&

‘Remember the issue is WHAT LAW FORM ARE YOU COMING FROM? if it’s a Private Trust you had better have a SHOWING of a CLAIM or TITLE over on the Private Side. It is the SOURCE of where the Title is coming from not so much the name of the party whether he’s the living man, the strawman, but ALL TITLES ARE PROSECUTED BY TRUSTEES. How do you get the Title to the property on the private side when presumably the state is the priority lien holder? Well you have a PRIORITY LIEN CLAIM on property and the LIEN CLAIM is filed as a ‘NOTICE OF LIEN’ in the UCC filings but you’re ONLY filing the NOTICE, NOT the Security that creates the Lien and since you’re NOT filing or recording the actual security the claim itself has NOT been turned over to the public to make it a PUBLIC TITLE CLAIM. It STAYS PRIVATE because you did NOT REGISTER the Security; you just registered NOTICE of the security.

Now that the Title is PRIVATE, the strawman who’s the private Trustee, representing that property claim – THE LIEN – is coming from the PRIVATE SIDE and you want to make sure it does NOT affect a PUBLIC INTEREST. How do you PROTECT IT? – Anytime a Public Entity throws a ‘charge’ on it you SET it OFF to cause it to go away so there’s NO public interest on it. Then the TITLE REMAINS IN THE PRIVATE TRUST but as soon as a Public Beneficiary throws a ‘charge’ on it (allegation – assumption & presumption) and claims that the grantor didn’t SETTLE the charge then doesn’t the property now have a ‘Public Interest’? Because one of the ‘Beneficiaries’, one of the Public Corporations is claiming that the property or the TITLE to the property is being LEVIED WITH A PUBLIC CHARGE that is unsettled, now the property has a PUBLIC CLAIM or PUBLIC INTEREST to it.’ – Jack Smith

UNDERSTAND THAT YOU HAVE TO REDUCE EVERY ISSUE BETWEEN YOU AND THEM TO A CONSITUTIONAL TORT. ITS EITHER GOING TO BE A DENIAL OF SUBSTANTIVE OR PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS OR DENIAL OF RIGHT TO PRIVATE PROPERTY.

IF YOU’RE DOING THIS RIGHT THE ONLY WAY YOU CAN DO THIS IS IF YOU HAVE A PRIVATE TITLE. THEY ARE ATTEMPTING TO SUBROGATE YOUR TITLE TO PUBLIC POLICY. SO THE ISSUE THEN IS THE CONSTITIONAL TORT OF PUBLIC CONFISCATION OF PRIVATE TITLE RIGHTS WITH NO JUST COMPENSATION, THAT IS PROHIBITED BY THE CONSTITUTION – IT’S CALLED THEFT.

Hi Folks, this one above is actually very very critical in the scheme of any issue being dealt with through the courts or public tribunal, especially when you are doing everything right in terms of settling and closing a case and making a party whole so that you remove their standing.

Also for those that don't know your PRIVATE TITLE refers to any 'CERTIFICATE OF PROTEST', - THAT IS NOW A PRIVATE TITLE and a PRIVATE PROPERTY CLAIM.

TIME IS, USUALLY OF THE ESSENCE - And I also want to tell you that these people are NOT against PLAYING DIRTY in terms of ‘Bending Reality’ to make the record APPEAR as though they have given you notice, when in fact they have CONCEALED what they’re doing so that the time expires, out of a response from you.’ – Jack Smith &&&

‘These people (lawyers, magistrates) will be reasonably CONSTRUCTIVE at doing nasty little ‘Procedural things’ that make it APPEAR that they have a ‘Trust Agreement’ with you because you failed to respond.’ – Jack Smith

Now the fact is that TRUST LAW GIVES YOU A REMEDY. You’ve got a Grantor, you’ve got a Trustee and you’ve got a Beneficiary and they’re going to give you PROCEDURAL REMEDIES so that they grantor and Trustee can give the Beneficiary his remedy and if the Beneficiary obtains his remedy, then the Beneficiary has NO STANDING anymore in any kind of a Tribunal to proceed.

And that’s all you need to do, is you NEED TO GIVE THE BENEFICIARY HIS ADEQUATE REMEDY, not by arguing with them, not by fighting with them but just give him the DAMN REMEDY so that he has NO STANDING ANYMORE.’ – Jack Smith.

Every structured COMMERCIAL or LEGAL ARGUMENT occurs between a BENEFICIARY, as plaintiff and a Trustee as THE DEFENDANT and most of these argument start out in the PRIVATE SECTOR when one of the Public Corporate benefits has a ‘gripe’ with one of the Private Trustees about not having received a benefit (payment) as a result of some usually written Trust agreement that needs performance. Now REMEMBER in Trust law the Trustee (you) is presumed GUILTY in ANY CHARGE OR CLAIM by a Beneficiary UNLESS the Trustee, with his records can prove himself innocent.; - Jack Smith.

‘COMMON LAW is the ‘Substantive law’ which applies to the people and if there is NO MONEY (lawful money) then we cannot have the LAW OF THE LAND as being the practicing substantive law under ‘Common law’. So if there is no lawful money then what is in reality the true common law? – TRUST LAW! They have MORPHED Trust law in place of what used to be Common law which gives you a REMEDY under the correct applications of Trust law.’ – Jack Smith.

‘The Problem is, are the people in the PRIVATE or are they in the PUBLIC? If you are in the PUBLIC you can’t ‘APPEAR AS PEOPLE’ you have got to appear as a ‘PERSON’ these days because a democracy DOES NOT recognize people or ‘living beings’ – Jack Smith &&

‘The Real issue is the JURISDICTIONAL VENUE because if you DEFINE the ‘Jurisdictional Venue’ you have defined the parties and you have defined the LAW!’ – Jack Smith

The“Either ACCEPT the ‘Private Instrument’ if you can SHOW its NO GOOD then use the Public instrument (Money Order made out for the amount of the public utility bill) but if you use the PUBLIC INSTRUMENT without showing me how the ‘Private Instrument’s’ no good, are you telling me that you can COMPEL the private Trust to GRANT all their Titles to the Public WITHOUT adequate compensation? Is that what your law is, it violates the constitution of no private property taking without just compensation and the Private Trust is trying to compel the PUBLIC TRUST but the private Trust can only operate without involuntary servitude. Do you mean if I don’t use Public Funds, which has a Public Interest to discharge the ‘water Bill’ you won’t provide me any services thereby denying me my public Trust Benefits when I have compensated you for them by private consideration? - Jack Smith [Where is the Title -10-03-2008 – 105min]

The above is an example whereby someone had used a private instrument to setoff the 'water Bill - Utilities'. They came back and said that the bank would not accept it, however the Bank was not the drawee of the instrument so it could not prove it was no good, as long as the instrument tendered has the critical wording 'PAY TO THE ORDER OF' then it is a valid instrument. The person above then went to the utitlities company and gave them a 'money order" (Public funds) to which they told the utilities people under strict 'Letter Rogatory' instructions either ACCEPT THE PRIVATE INSTRUMENT if you can show its no good, THEN use the public instrument BUT if you use the PUBLIC INSTRUMENT (money order) without SHOWING ME how the private instrument is no good. - read the rest above.
se quotes below are in relation to your CERTIFICATE OF PROTEST after they have been placed UNDER SEAL by the Notary Public. Once again important notes to understand, Please Keep filed.

‘Is there any part of a record UNDER SEAL that under the rules of evidence requires any sworn testimony to be received by this tribunal? The PURPOSE of having a RECORD UNDER SEAL is that the Public Seal brings the record into the evidence WITHOUT sworn testimony. So there is NO ARGUMENT to be required in that Public Hearing. All they have to do is acknowledge that they have received THE RECORD, under seal’ Remember all the Notary has to do is bring his SEALED RECORD. Now if the court would ever get your Notary to raise his hand and ‘swear in’ the question from the Notary should be ‘ Are you telling me that under the rules of evidence, this court is refusing to accept this record, under seal, in violation of the rules of evidence without me swearing in. – Jack Smith & & &

‘Why does the NOTARY ‘swear in’? The Notary is the agent of a Foreigner and he’s bringing a SEALED RECORD and under the rules of evidence a sealed record speaks for itself and there’s absolutely no requirement for anyone to swear in and give testimony about a sealed record and if he swears in to give testimony is he not now appearing in ‘this court’ as though they are the evidence gathering body instead of them receiving evidence.’ YOU ALWAYS HAVE TO BE ONTO THE FACT THAT THESE PEOPLE ARE GOING TO TEST YOU TO SEE IF YOU’RE WILLING TO CONVERT YOUR PRIVATE RECORD INTO THEIR PUBLIC TESTIMONY.’ We’re tying to instruct people out there that the reason it is UNDER SEAL is that the rules of evidence says that Foreign Records from public sources under seal DOES NOT have to be sworn to –Jack Smith.

Residents of Australia - Residents are those entities that have a closer association with the territory of Australia than with any other territory. Examples are: general government bodies; financial and trading enterprises and non-profit bodies producing goods or services or both within the territory of Australia; and persons whose centre of interest is considered to lie in Australia. (For a precise definition see Balance of Payments and International Investment Position, Australia: Concepts, Sources and Methods (Cat. no. 5331.0) paragraphs 2.10 to 2.11.)

Any entity which is not determined to be a resident of Australia is classified as a resident of the rest of 'the world'.

http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/5232.0Glossary1Sep%202007...

We would like to frame our writings in our procedures in the nature of the Trust Structure. & & &

For instance we have been calling the living man the ‘Secured Party Creditor’, what’s wrong with calling him the ‘GRANTOR IN FACT’ – duh! Isn’t that exactly what he is?

And as far as their proceedings are going, they’re operating in their proceedings in the nature OF A TRUST and if you said, ‘Comes now the Trust Grantor in Fact’ what position is the Judge going to have in his eyeballs when he reads ‘the Grantor in Fact’ because he (The Judge) is assuming to be the grantor by way of an abandonment of the position and they understand that this is a PRIVATE TRUST anyway and consequently you have now just created a ‘Material conflict’ between what the Notary is going to be presenting if In fact your prima facie evidence handled everything and what the so-called magistrate or judge of the proceedings in ‘this court’ is doing, in fact, because he is assuming the role of the Grantor because its abandoned but all the paperwork coming from ‘THE WORLD’ (Private Venue) under the seal of the Notary is saying, ‘GRANTOR IN FACT’ of the Cestui que Trust.

Back in 1611 there was a case called the duke of Norfolk what he did is started the doctrine AGAINST perpetuities. You cannot hold property for more than one lifetime plus 21 years. Since then they have adopted a little more length of time but basically it means one lifetime. If the interest or property has not passed within one lifetime, then it cannot pass at all.

What it does is it REVERTS back to the state which is a Corporate Entity UNDER THE CROWN. EVERYTHING IS OWNED BY THE CROWN. The Crown was behind this so that they could keep property IN COMMERCE and get a REVENUE on it. They cannot collect revenue on property that is held in perpetuity because it takes it out of commerce. The Crown are doing what they are PROHIBITING everyone else from doing – that is they are PREVENTING the holding of property in perpetuity. That is where the DEED OF TRUST came from. & & & 12

Aah aint truth grand? Because the only thing left when the truth is rejected is - 'THE LIE'.
You may possibly want to check with your local council and see whether they actually have a 'priority claim' or interest in your property. In other words they may actually have a 'first or second priority lien/caveat on your property'. - All under admiralty/maritime of course. Unless of course you have a Mortgage, then the bank would have a caveat/lien filed with the "Land Titles office'. - So who owns your property? You see it is amazing when you don't have real lawful money to actually buy the allodial title to your property, instead you get a "Certificate OF THE TITLE'. which is the liabiilty/debtor side of the account.

Bubble # 18 – Warrants and Affidavits
Did you know when an Officer of the law tries to serve a warrant, you have the right to see the supporting affidavit and that without one, the warrant is unlawful?

You can also use that Affidavit as a foundation of your defence if you need to. Is all the information correct? Was it properly sworn and attested to? Don’t ever be happy just seeing the warrant; often times they try to play fast and loose and if you catch them in it, the process can be cancelled.
Laws alone cannot secure freedom of expression; in order that every man present his views without penalty there must be spirit of tolerance in the entire population.

Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955)
It is the spirit and not the form of law that keeps justice alive.

“Prior to 1933 when men and women were presumed under the protections of the NATURAL-LAW by PUBLIC LAW then in the courts, the SUBSTANCE and the FACTS were ALL relevant and TRUTH by way of Affidavits and other forms of evidence where the proper procedure were used in order to invoke a proper outcome from the courts.

Post 1933 we have NO PUBLIC LAW RECOGNIZING UNALIENABLE RIGHTS for men and women. In fact there are no unalienable rights for ANY participants in the court system, because the court system ONLY has as participants, TITLES OF NOBIILTY and FICTIONS. Titles of Nobility and FICTIONS do NOT have unalienable rights so the court system does NOT have to grant unalienable rights to anyone that’s a participant in the court system.” – Jack Smith.

“The courts are run on COMMERCIAL CONTRACT LAW and that is has NOTHING to do with any IN-LAW procedures whatsoever. So the nature of the game is to OBTAIN a CONTRACT with your OPPONENT (Adversary) so that the court can acknowledge and RATIFY the contract and SETTLE and CLOSE the case and move on and if you understand that EVERYTHING in there is happening by way of CONTRACTS instead of trying to get the truth out then MAYBE you’ll get the truth to prevail by following the CORRECT procedure to get them to acknowledge the truth by CONTRACTUAL CONSENT.” – Jack Smith.

“Now the New Testament said that YOU are to go to your brother to reach a SETTLEMENT and if he will NOT reach a settlement, then you GO WITH A WITNESS. Well when you go to your brother you’re doing your PRIVATE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS by way of LETTER ROGATORY and requests, Affidavits of NEGATIVE AVERMENT and other forms of THIRD PARTY EVIDENCE that is brought into the proceedings. Most likely “your brother” will NOT answer you and in this case “your brother’ is the administrative agency or whatever it is that you’re dealing with. If he does NOT answer you, you go to step 2, you take a WITNESS being the PUBLIC NOTARY. Why is he the witness? BECAUSE HE CAN BE SEEN BY BOTH JURISDICTIONAL VENUES! He has a SEAL which is recognized in THEIR system and he has also been authorized in his capacity as a Notary to take sworn testimony and other evidence UNDER SEAL as an EVIDENTIARY RECORD for the agency to review for acceptance and acknowledgement.” – Jack Smith.

“Now the way that you get your REMEDY then is YOU PROPOSE the CONTRACT to your opponent by these ADMINISTRATIVE PRIVATE PROCEDURES in which you are dealing with SUBSTANCE of a matter with ACTUAL evidence and you’re dealing with the FORM of the matter in Admiralty/Maritime and NOT the common law because Admiralty/Maritime is the proper administrative procedures for resolving these issues until you EXHAUST your administrative remedy, you have NO CAPACITY for any judicial review of any kind whatsoever. Now the ADMINSTRATIVE REMEDIES are actually CARRIED OUT IN PRIVATE, private letter negotiations back and forth between the parties.” Jack Smith

“So government agencies MOST of the time carry on PRIVATE NEGOTIATIONS in order to ILLICIT A CONTRACT from YOU PRIOR to going into any public proceedings. All you have to do is MIRROR-IMAGE THAT! If an govt agency writes your strawman a letter, that’s a PRIVATE LETTER OF NEGOTIATION for CONTRACT – SETTLEMENT, it’s NOT public. In fact their documents which are lodged in their public records system are immune from dissemination TO the public by the PRIVACY ACT and other statutes. If you DON’T PROPOSE YOUR private CONTRACT as a measure of last resort the public will PROPOSE a contract to YOU! And the Contract will be purviewed under public policy, which is ENTIRELY different to public Law or Unalienable rights and Natural-Law. THE PARTY PROPOSING THE CONTRACT CAN ACTUALLY SET THE JURISDICTION AND VENUE and the issues raised” – Jack Smith

“So EVERYTHING going on in the court is CONTRACT LAW and they have a fantastic ability to play these little games so that basically you will acknowledge their PUBLIC OFFERING by PRIVATE ACCEPTANCE through the games they play with you and you don’t know how to negotiate CONTRACTS and you don’t know any different.

THEIR offer in PUBLIC SESSION cannot look at the SUBSTANCE, the REALITY and the TRUTH of YOUR RECORD in that PUBLIC session.[Only in the private -"In-Chambers"]” – Jack Smith.

“Everything is done by CONTRACT. It DOESN’T matter whether it’s Civil or Criminal. There is NO LAW anymore because there is NO MONEY (Of substance) and since there is NO LAW and since there is NO MONEY everything is done by CONTRACT, it’s AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES. So remember,that theoretically anything that is done COMMERCIALLY in the CIVIL WORLD by any kind of “accounts”, its BASED ON A SIGNATURE.”– Jack Smith.

“The guy who THINKS he is an “EMPLOYEE” is NOT, it’s a CORPORATE FICTION, which is the “Employee”. NO living MAN OR WOMAN went to work in their system. The ALTER-EGO – THE SHADOW (Called the “Employee”) went to work in their system. So they DO NOT see living men or women and they are not employing living men and women they are employing CORPORATIONS called EMPLOYEES.” – Jack Smith.

“The INCOME TAX act is totally constitutional as it applies to Corporations; it’s totally UN-Constitutional as it applies to LIVING men and women because living men and women have UN-A-LIEN-ABLE rights to their Labour but corporations are operating under a government licence and the Income tax on the receipts of the corporation basically is NOT A direct tax like on property, it is a tax on the way of doing business through the PRIVILEGE of being an incorporated ENTITY.

In other words the government CREATED YOU as a LEGAL ENTITY and the government has a “RIGHT” to tax it’s creation in any way shape and form it wants. The government CANNOT tax people because the government did NOT create people, God created people but the government when it creates a corporation can tax its own corporate entities into oblivion. So therefore NO MAN or WOMAN EVER worked for any corporation in the modern times, all that WORKS for the corporations are ONE-MAN LEGAL ENTITIES, FICTION-STRAWMEN.” – Jack Smith.

“No matter what you do it’s important that you DON’T do a “General appearance” (in court) because once you do a “General Appearance” YOU and the DEFENDANT (fiction) are the SAME and you’re in the public area UNDER the PUBLIC OFFERING.

Remember THE CHARGE IS A PUBLIC OFFERING and once you APPEAR to answer that public offering in the public - YOU ARE IN PRIVATE ACCEPTANCE of a PUBLIC CONTRACT and I am TELLING YOU your ONLY REMEDY is to get a PRIVATE OFFER with PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE to get you your remedy.

A Public offer with private acceptance will get you BOAT LOADS of problems because you’re UNDER PUBLIC POLICY. Understand it this way, if you have a PRIVATE OFFERING with PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE you will get a PRIVATE EXECUTION. If you have a PUBLIC OFFERING with PRIVATE ACCEPTANCE you are STUCK with a PUBLIC EXECUTION, which you’re NOT going to appreciate.” – Jack Smith.

"If you DON'T want to serve on THE JURY you have to have a reason why. Now you walk in and they always swear you in. Now if you walk in there and say, " I am Hebrew and I practice the law of God and I cannot take the Oath so I cannot SWEAR that I will accept THE LAW from you Judge"

You see to SERVE on a Jury you have to VIOLATE the ten commandments. You can't serve on a Jury and practice the ten commandments. So once you AGREE to divorce yourself from the ten commandments and that you will ACCEPT THE LAW that the Judge gives you and that you'll follow the courts instructions ( Jury instructions). The Judge will INSTRUCT you as to how the verdict will come out, then you can serve on the Jury" - George Gordon.

"Can I be compelled to violate the HIGHER LAW of the creator in order to take an Oath, which I am NOT allowed to do as it is in violation of the HIGHER LAW"

“When it comes to INCOME TAX its not really an “income tax” so much that it’s a TRUSTEE FEE based on the fact that all these CORPORATIONS are “Subsets” of the government. The government is the FIDUCIARY and basically the “Income Tax” is the TRUSTEE FEE for the government regulating the corporations. Since INCOME TAX is NOT levied on living men and women, there is NO constitutional limitation liability or Tort Whatsoever. Taxes are ONLY levied on CORPORATE ENTITIES and to the extent that LIVING PEOPLE get “tied up” in this mess based on their IGNORANCE!” – Jack Smith.

In 1933 by PUBLIC POLICY the government took away LAWFUL MONEY. By taking away Lawful money it took away the UNALIENABLIE RIGHTS of living men and women to POSSESS TITLE to any goods or property of any kind whatsoever.

Since it took away the unalienable right to have “Money” so that you can SECURE Titles, the government either created a MASSIVE TORT against all living men and women which is Treason and a violation of unalienable rights OR else the government gave them a REMEDY that would make them totally whole which would NOT prejudice them in anyway shape and form in dealing with property.

So the government said, “We’re going to take away your money so therefore you don’t need any money BUT you can go along with the ILLUSION that exists ,and we’ve got a PRE-PAID account when we make any kind of demands on you, just request through the PROPER parties that they APPLY a setoff, then you’re NOT damaged because if your SETOFF is the EQUIVALENT to lawful money so that you get TITLE and CONTROL then you have NO claim against us we have no Tort against you. So just realize that you are PRE-PAID on EVERYTHING that they might demand that you do as long as you go through the proper procedure for requesting the setoff. “ – Jack Smith.

“When we get to the SIGNATURE thing, what we’re going to end up doing is “LOOKING IN THE MIRROR” and the clad solution being corded administratively can be the best possible thing going – that may be their CONFESSION. It’s one of the BEST indicators we have got. In other words when we really are on top of the thing, on the issue or whatever the area may be and all of a sudden THINGS GO SILENT on THEIR SIDE then that can be the BEST CONFIRMATION going that we are intellectually and procedurally exactly where we NEEDTO BE. Their SILENCE can be the BEST ANSWER!” – Harmon Taylor

"Silence is their AGREEMENT!".

Who here today VALUES property rights the most?

THE ONE WHO HAS CONTROL OVER IT must value the property MORE than anyone else because CONTROL is just about everything and who has control of everything? – THE STATE!

You people have ALL the unalienable rights to property BUT you gave them up to people who have MORE KNOWLEDGE to what’s going on by VOLUNTARY CONTRACT and so YOU AIN’T GOT THEM NO MORE! Because you can VOLUNTARILY RELINQUISH your rights BY CONTRACT.” – Jack Smith.

“The CONCEPT is though that you have to get an AGREEMENT BY CONTRACT and you KNOW that they are NOT going to respond. So the way that you are going to get your contract is THROUGH the public Notary through that process of showing an administrative procedure to the proper parties and their FAILURE to respond and then you are going to have to lodge the final result the evidence of that contract with the PROPER party With PETITION on the PRIVATE SIDE to get the acknowledgement.” – Jack Smith.

“How do you do these CONTRACTS and stay in CONTROL? You have to understand the PROTOCOLS because the protocols are SYMBOLIC of who you are willing to become in the relationship and if you don’t understand that the protocols are symbolic of the CONTRACT that you are negotiating and then you can say one thing and then do the opposite by your protocols. Your protocols are presumed to be YOUR ACTIONS, they speak LOUDER than your words and if you are contravening your own words and so your actions put you in a disadvantage from the contract and into the public and just like the Judge says, “All your unalienable rights are now CONTRACTED AWAY and they are now in the hands of those that VALUE them the most. Who values them the most? Those that UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY ARE and how you maintain them. Evidently you didn’t learn how to maintain and negotiate and maintain those rights!” – Jack Smith.

“The problem is that you go to the PUBLIC FOOL SYSTEM and they’re NOT about training you on CONTRACTS on the PRIVATE SIDE, they’re about getting you to ACCEPT PUBLIC OFFERINGS so that the schools of the corporations are in CONTROL.” – Jack Smith.

“So what did it cost the living man to pay the taxes? SIGNATURE,, AUTHORITY, PERMISSION and the taxes are SETOFF but the Internal Revenue Services (ATO) was going a “RETURN” was filed with a voucher (1099 form) for setoff so the TRUSTEE FEES are paid and because the returns are filed they are asking us to AUDIT THE SETOFF on the Mortgage. Can they observe the audit on the Mortgage and approve it. If they ACCEPT the taxes aren’t they verifying that the Mortgage was paid? So basically what you’re doing is getting a SECOND WITNESS to the commercial transaction and Scripture says if you haven’t got a second witness, YOU AIN’T GOT NOTHING!” – Jack Smith

“The term RESIDE technically “moves” you off the Land. A RESIDENT in INTERNATIONAL LAW is a PERSON in a country NOT his own and INHABITANTS are the same thing, it’s all deceptive.” L.B Bork.

“There is NO state citizenship right now. The only citizenship there is right now is DEFACTO. A CITIZENSHIP is a term that applies to POLITICAL RIGHTS because there are NO governments for us to participate in unless you want to be [1] An INSURGENT and you can be part of your state government or Federal, what ever the case may be or be a REBEL and vote for the Insurgent (Defacto Govt). There is NO state citizenship unless you want to participate (Vote) in an insurgent system” – L.B. Bork

Please note, that by "Participation" in "Voting", you are deemed to be in REBELLION to the original, lawful and dejure jurisdiction and therefore also an "Insurgent" by "force of law". So that you are compelled to violate the creators law in order to participate in an "ungodly system". I think it's time to tender your;

"NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF CONSENT" - to participate in a system that is in rebellion to the original and lawful, dejure government/jurisdiction. This is my official notice and DECREE as it is my right to exercise responsibility

This Quote is in regards to the continued state of emergency that we have been under since early last century.

“What they did in their minds was an “act of emergency” or cause for emergency and really it wasn’t it was actually USURPATION to put this EXTENDED COMMERCIAL SYSTEM in place and pull people into the jurisdiction of the Federal government to have them CONTROLLED by legislation where the Federal government could NOT CONTROL them before and to give Corporations power.” – L.B Bork

“I won’t stand there ( in court) and argue, I let MY AFFIDAVITS speak for itself and if I try and ADD TO IT and START TALKING now all of a sudden I am Testifying and I am NOT interested in Testifying. MY AFFIDAVITS SPEAKS for itself, it is what it is, has ANYBODY COME FORWARD to REBUT my AFFIDAVIT? And THAT’S where I stay and I am a BROKEN RECORD and I DON’T go any further than the Defect (In the charging instrument – being the Plaintiff, who is it? And the Defendant? Who is it?) – Sam Davis.

Brian, W. - this one is especially for you! Please take note where Sam Davis says that he becomes a BROKEN RECORD! And does NOT STRAY. when you start "discussing' your case you are now "ADDING TO IT" and are testifying. - This one is a CRITICAL one to understand when proceeding with a private administrative process and your affidavit in a court or tribunal.

In reality, and it may APPEAR to you that, they’re (the magistrate/judge) is moving forward and that they DON’T care what you say and they’re moving forward and by golly if you don’t come along and PARTICIPATE in this trial (hearing) then you’re going to be washed down the river so to speak. Well that is really NOT THE CASE, they can pretend like they’re going on, they can go on, in fact they can hold their entire trial (hearing) and if they look at me and want a response from me, I am merely going to ask, “IS ANY OF THAT A RESPONSE OR REBUTTAL TO MY AFFIDAVIT?” Let them go wherever they want.” – Sam Davis

Just like Sam Davis says, you must be like a Broken Record and NOT TESTIFY and "add to it" (Your Affidavit).

CITIZENSHIP - YOUR NEW RELIGION AND CHURCH.

“CITIZENSHIP is one of these terms we need to be EXTRAORDINARILY aware of. It’s part of the “GOTCHA” system and it’s part of the language that’s convoluted and it’s one that we need to be FULLY aware of. If we’re talking about a U.S Citizen, we’re NO LONGER talking about a LAW OF THE LAND based system but a very DIFFERENT thing. It is one more item on the area that we look back on and sit down and now say, “oh my God what happened? It’s a LOOK ALIKE but it’s VERY, VERY different” – Harmon Taylor [Former Bar Attorney]

“I used to think that a U.S citizen was the right thing to be and have since OPTED OUT of participation IN THAT CHURCH, the CHURCH of the UNITED STATES (Inc), membership of the church of the Un